The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and assess the implementation of CROSS-MIND, a school-based mental well-being intervention for adolescents in Nepal. The study uses a Hybrid Type 1 mixed-methods design. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does CROSS-MIND improve students' mental well-being, self-esteem, and behavioural and emotional outcomes compared with usual school activities? Is CROSS-MIND acceptable, feasible, appropriate, and delivered with adequate fidelity, and what barriers and facilitators influence its delivery by teachers?
For the effectiveness evaluation, classes of grades 6 to 10 in five schools in Bharatpur Metropolitan City will be randomly assigned to receive either the CROSS-MIND intervention or usual school activities. Students will complete questionnaires before and after the intervention. Students in intervention classes will participate in eight weekly storytelling and reflection sessions of approximately 90 minutes, delivered by trained teachers. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions will also be conducted with selected students, teachers, school principals, and psychologists to explore experiences of the intervention and factors influencing its implementation.
Students enrolled in grades 6-10 in the participating schools
Students whose parent or guardian provides written informed consent
Students who provides written informed assent
None
Parallel
CROSS-MIND
BehavioralCROSS-MIND is an eight-week, teacher-facilitated school-based mental well-being intervention. Students participate in one approximately 90-minute storytelling circle session each week. Sessions use structured storytelling, reflection, creative expression, group discussion, and peer-reflection activities. Major intervention areas include establishing a safe and supportive group environment; identifying and exploring common adolescent challenges; using narrative externalisation to separate problems from personal identity; reflecting on life experiences, strengths, and aspirations through Life River activities; identifying coping skills and supportive relationships; and consolidating learning through reflective writing, poetry or letter-writing and a closing celebration.
Change from baseline in the mean mental well-being score after the intervention
The primary outcome, mental well-being, will be measured using Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale. It uses a five-point Likert response scale and has a total score range of 14-70, with higher scores indicating better mental well-being.
Change from baseline in the mean Self-Esteem score after the intervention
Self-esteem will be measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. It uses a four-point Likert response scale and has a total score range of 0-30, with higher scores indicating better outcome i.e. higher self-esteem.
Change from baseline in the mean depressive symptoms score after the intervention
Depressive symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire -adolescent version. It uses a four-point response scale and has a total score range of 0-27, with higher scores indicating worse outcome i.e., depressive symptoms.
Change from baseline in the mean anxiety symptoms score after the intervention
Anxiety symptoms will be measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 adolescent version. It uses a four-point Likert response scale and has a total score range of 0-21, with higher scores indicating worse outcome i.e., higher anxiety symptoms.
Change from baseline in the mean difficulty score after the intervention
Total difficulty will be measured using the Strength and Difficulty Questionnaire adolescent self-administration version. It uses a three-point response scale and has a total score range of 0-40, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes, i.e., greater difficulty.
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options:
