Effectiveness and Safety of ArcBlate Palliative Treatment for Patients With Painful Bone Metastases: A Pivotal Study

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorEpiSonica

About this trial

A Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of ArcBlate Palliative Treatment for Patients With Painful Bone Metastases

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Men and women aged 18 and older.

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 at enrollment.

Patients who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits.

Patients who are suffering from painful bone metastases.

Disqualifiers

need surgical stabilization of the affected bony structure (>7 fracture risk score), Or

targeted tumor is at an impending fracture site (>7 on fracture risk score), Or

patients with surgical stabilization of tumor site with metallic hardware. (2) Targeted (treated) lesion is in the skull. (3) Patients on dialysis. (4) Patients with life expectancy < 3-Months. (5) Patients with an acute medical condition (e.g., pneumonia, sepsis) that is expected to hinder them from completing this study.

Unstable angina pectoris on medication,

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ArcBlate Focused Ultrasound Ablation System

    Device

    MR-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgHIFU)

  • Sham MRgHIFU treatment

    Other intervention

    Sham MRgHIFU treatment

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: MRgHIFU treatment armExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Sham treatment armSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Pain response rate to therapy at 30 days after treatment

Pain response rate is assessed by composite endpoint of change from baseline in worst Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score (0-10 scale) and morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) intake. Patients with Complete response (CR) or Partial response (PR) are defined as responders to therapy. 1. Complete response (CR): Pain score 0 without analgesic increase. 2. Partial response (PR): Pain reduction of 2 or more without analgesic increase; or analgesic reduction of 25% without pain increase. The proportion of responders of the subjects who completed treatment is defined as the pain response rate of this study.

Time frame
at 30 days after treatment

Secondary outcomes

1

Change from baseline in NRS pain score (0-10 scale)

The changes of NRS pain score between post-treatment and pre-treatment. The pain NRS is a single 11-point numeric scale (0-10 scale), with 0 representing one pain extreme (e.g., "no pain") and 10 representing the other pain extreme (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" and "worst pain imaginable").

Time frame
at 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment
2

Change from baseline in MEDD intake

The changes of MEDD intake between post-treatment and pre-treatment.

Time frame
at 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment
3

Change from baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-QoL)

The changes of BPI between post-treatment and pre-treatment. The BPI is used to rapidly assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions. The BPI has seven interference items, such as general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (including housework), relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. The assessment areas of the BPI include severity of pain, impact of pain on daily function, location of pain, pain medications and amount of pain relief in the past 24 hours or the past week.

Time frame
at 30, 60 and 90 days after treatment
4

Pain response rate to therapy

Patients with Complete response (CR) or Partial response (PR) are defined as responders to therapy.

Time frame
at 60 and 90 days after treatment

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.