Effectiveness and Safety of OSTENIL® TENDON in the Treatment of Pain and Restricted Mobility in Tendon Disorders

ConditionTendinopathy
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18-99
SponsorTRB Chemedica AG

About this trial

PMCF study to further substantiate the effectiveness and safety of OSTENIL® TENDON in the overall as well as indication-specific treatment of pain and restricted mobility in four different tendon disorders (patella tendon, peroneal tendon, medial epicondylus humeri and iliotibial band) in a real-life clinical setting when used according to the instructions for use.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient aged between 18 and 99 years

Diagnosis of symptomatic tendinopathy (patella tendon, peroneal tendon, medial epicondylus humeri or iliotibial band)

Physician's recommendation to use OSTENIL® TENDON prior to recruitment

Signed informed consent

Disqualifiers

Presence of any contra-indication or precautionary condition listed in the instructions for use, i.e.,

Ascertained hypersensitivity to any of the OSTENIL® TENDON constituents

Known pregnancy or breast feeding

Acute trauma

Trial population

Patients over 18 years of age with symptomatic tendinopathy (patella tendon, peroneal tendon, medial epicondylus humeri or iliotibial band) and a recommendation for OSTENIL® TENDON treatment.

Trial design

Design model

Case-only

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • OSTENIL® TENDON

    Device

    OSTENIL® TENDON is a CE-certified viscoelastic solution intended for peritendinous or intrasheath injection, containing 2 % sodium hyaluronate from fermentation.

Treatment groups

84 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: OSTENIL® TENDON1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change of pain intensity 3 months after end of treatment compared to baseline (visual analogue scale)

Evaluation of pain intensity by the patient on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. 100 mm equals the worst pain.

Time frame
Baseline compared to week 12 after the end of treatment.

Secondary outcomes

1

Change of Upper -/ Lower Extremity Functional Scale compared to baseline

Indication specific patient questionnaire to assess effectiveness of treatment on a 5-point Likert scale (range: 0 = extreme difficulty to perform activity to 4 = no difficulty).

Time frame
Baseline compared to week 1 as well as weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the end of treatment.
2

Change of pain intensity compared to baseline (visual analogue scale)

Evaluation of pain intensity by the patient on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. 100 mm equals the worst pain.

Time frame
Baseline compared to week 1 as well as weeks 4 and 24 after the end of treatment.
3

Change of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM)

Patient questionnaire to assess the following aspects (100 mm visual analogue scale; 100 mm equals a worse outcome): pain, global and tendon-associated quality of life, daily activities, clinical global impression, mobility and satisfaction with treatment (note: not assessed at baseline)

Time frame
Baseline (except satifaction with treatment), week 1 and weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the end of treatment.
4

Change of investigator-reported outcome measures

Investigator inquiry to record the perception of the physician of the following aspects (100 mm visual analogue scale; 100 mm equals a worse outcome): clinical global impression regarding the clinical severity of the tendinopathy and satisfaction with the treatment (note: not assessed at baseline)

Time frame
Baseline (except satisfaction with treatment), week 1 and weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the end of treatment.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.