About this trial
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate superiority of treatment with the Ulthera System compared to untreated control for the improvement of skin laxity of the lower face, submental area and neck and to demonstrate the safety of treatment with the Ulthera System for the improvement of skin laxity of the lower face, submental area and neck.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Mild to moderate lower face, submental and/or neck laxity, that is amenable to improvement with non-invasive intervention and not severe enough for surgical intervention.
Willing to abstain from all other aesthetic treatments on ANY part of the face, submentum or neck, including but not limited to injectable fillers, implants, neurotoxin, skin peels, laser treatments, surgical treatments, etc. for the clinical investigation's duration.
Willing and able to refrain from chronic use of aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for 10 to 14 days post-treatment.
Has an adequate understanding of the Chinese language.
Disqualifiers
Scarring in area(s) to be treated.
Any active implants.
Any metallic implants in area(s) to be treated.
Any open wounds or lesions, including active herpes simplex, in the area(s) to be treated.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Ulthera System
DeviceParticipants will receive treatment with the Ulthera system which consists of three primary components: the control unit, handpiece and interchangeable transducers.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Proportion of Participants With at Least "Improved" in Lower Face, Submental and Neck Skin Laxity on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale as Determined by the Blinded Live Evaluator (eGAIS) at Day 90 Compared to Baseline Photographs
Blinded live evaluator will use eGAIS to evaluate global aesthetic improvement in the facial appearance of participants. The GAIS is a 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1(very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Secondary outcomes
Three Independent, Blinded Raters GAIS (rGAIS) Score in Lower Face, Submental and Neck Skin Laxity at Day 90 Compared to Baseline Photographs
Three independent, blinded raters will use rGAIS to evaluate global aesthetic improvement in the facial appearance of participants. The GAIS is a 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1(very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Treating Investigator's GAIS (iGAIS) Score in Lower Face, Submental and Neck Skin Laxity at Day 90 Compared to Baseline Photographs
Treating investigators will use the iGAIS to assess overall aesthetic improvement of the lower face, submentum, and neck. The GAIS is a 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1(very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. This outcome measure is prespecified for the Treatment Group only.
Participant's GAIS (pGAIS) Scores in Lower Face, Submental Skin and Neck Laxity at Day 90 Compared to Baseline Photographs
Participants will self-report using the pGAIS to assess overall aesthetic improvement of the lower face, submentum, and neck. The pGAIS is a 5-point scale (1-5), where: 1(very much improved); 2 (much improved); 3 (improved); 4 (no change); 5 (worse). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. This outcome measure is prespecified for the Treatment Group only.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Merz North America, Inc.
Lead sponsor
Ulthera, Inc
Collaborator