Effectiveness of Dental Bleaching Using Different Designs of 3D-Printed and Conventional Customized Nightguards

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya

About this trial

This randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of at-home dental bleaching using customized nightguards fabricated by digital (3D-printed CAD-CAM) and conventional methods, with and without reservoirs. Adult participants with good general and oral health and a baseline tooth shade of A2 or darker undergo bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide. Outcomes include tooth color change (subjective and spectrophotometric measures), tooth sensitivity, gingival irritation, patient comfort, and patient satisfaction over time.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults aged 18 years or older

Good general and oral health

No current medical treatment (self-reported)

No need for surgical, endodontic, periodontal, or restorative dental treatment

Disqualifiers

Previous tooth bleaching treatment

Orthodontic appliances or prostheses that interfere with treatment

Severe intrinsic discoloration (e.g., tetracycline staining, fluorosis, or endodontically treated teeth with discoloration)

Pregnancy or lactation

Trial design

Design model

Factorial

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Customized bleaching tray fabrication

    Procedure/Surgery

    Customized bleaching trays were fabricated using either a conventional vacuum-forming technique or a digital CAD-CAM 3D-printing technique, according to randomized allocation within a split-mouth design.

  • Reservoir tray design

    Procedure/Surgery

    Tray designs were prepared either with a reservoir or without a reservoir, according to randomized allocation across hemiarches within the split-mouth design.

  • Carbamide peroxide 10%

    Drug

    At-home bleaching gel containing 10% carbamide peroxide applied in customized trays according to the study protocol

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Digital tray with reservoirExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: Digital tray without reservoirExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group C: Conventional tray with reservoirExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group D: Conventional tray without reservoirExperimental treatment 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Tooth color change (spectrophotometer; ΔE*ab)

Tooth color measured with a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade) using CIE L\*, a\*, b\* values. Color change will be calculated as ΔE\*ab relative to baseline (T0). Measurements are standardized using a customized positioner. Bleaching was performed from T0 through T5. No bleaching gel was applied between T5 and T6; T6 assessed post-treatment stability and adverse effects.

Time frame
T0 (baseline, Day 0); T1 (Week 1); T2 (Week 2); T3 (Week 3); T4 (Week 4); T5 (Week 6, end of bleaching); T6 (Week 8, 2 weeks post-bleaching).
2

Tooth shade change (VITA Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER; shade guide units)

Tooth shade assessed visually using the VITA Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER. Shade guide scores will be converted to numeric values and reported as change from baseline (T0) at each time point. Bleaching was performed from T0 through T5. No bleaching gel was applied between T5 and T6; T6 assessed post-treatment stability and adverse effects.

Time frame
T0 (baseline, Day 0); T1 (Week 1); T2 (Week 2); T3 (Week 3); T4 (Week 4); T5 (Week 6, end of bleaching); T6 (Week 8, 2 weeks post-bleaching).

Secondary outcomes

1

Tooth sensitivity (Numeric Rating Scale, 0-4)

Tooth sensitivity assessed using a 5-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): 0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = considerable, 4 = severe. For each visit, the worst (highest) NRS value reported at that assessment point will be used for analysis. Bleaching was performed from T0 through T5. No bleaching gel was applied between T5 and T6; T6 assessed post-treatment stability and adverse effects.

Time frame
T0 (baseline, Day 0); T1 (Week 1); T2 (Week 2); T3 (Week 3); T4 (Week 4); T5 (Week 6, end of bleaching); T6 (Week 8, 2 weeks post-bleaching).
2

Tooth sensitivity (Visual Analog Scale, 0-10)

Tooth sensitivity assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no sensitivity) to 10 (severe sensitivity). For each visit, the highest VAS value reported at that assessment point will be used for analysis. Bleaching was performed from T0 through T5. No bleaching gel was applied between T5 and T6; T6 assessed post-treatment stability and adverse effects.

Time frame
T0 (baseline, Day 0); T1 (Week 1); T2 (Week 2); T3 (Week 3); T4 (Week 4); T5 (Week 6, end of bleaching); T6 (Week 8, 2 weeks post-bleaching).
3

Gingival irritation presence (NRS, 0-2)

Gingival irritation presence assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale: 0 = absent, 1 = localized, 2 = generalized.

Time frame
T0 (baseline, Day 0); T1 (Week 1); T2 (Week 2); T3 (Week 3); T4 (Week 4); T5 (Week 6, end of bleaching); T6 (Week 8, 2 weeks post-bleaching).
4

Gingival irritation severity (NRS, 0-2)

Gingival irritation severity assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale: 0 = no irritation, 1 = gingival burning, 2 = erosion.

Time frame
T0 (baseline, Day 0); T1 (Week 1); T2 (Week 2); T3 (Week 3); T4 (Week 4); T5 (Week 6, end of bleaching); T6 (Week 8, 2 weeks post-bleaching).

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.