Effectiveness of Exercise Plus Pain Neuroscience Education on Brain Function in Knee Osteoarthritis

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age45+
SponsorUniversidad Santo Tomas, Chile

About this trial

A three-arm randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Fifty-nine participants with KOA will be recruited in a 1:1:1 ratio. Assessor, and statistician will be blinded to group allocation. One experimental group (n=19) will receive NME plus PNE, the other experimental group (n=19) will receive isolated NME and the control group (n=19) will continue with usual care. The PNE will be adapted to the context of the participants. Outcome measures will be brain activity, pressure pain threshold, pain intensity, disability, fear-avoidance beliefs, self-efficacy, and pain catastrophizing. Outcome measures will be evaluated pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and four-month post-intervention.

The investigators hypothesize that there will be significant differences in favor of the NME plus PNE intervention group.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

women and men at least 45 years old radiologically diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral KOA (Kellgren-Lawrence 1-3 grading scale)

pain duration greater than three months

Disqualifiers

Patients who have received physical therapy or other conservative therapy in the previous three months and those who have a history of major knee trauma and surgery in the last six months

cardiac pathology

structural use of psychoactive medications, such as antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, and anxiolytics, during the past year

neurological diseases

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Neuromuscular exercise plus pain neuroscience education

    Other intervention

    The exercises follow neuromuscular principles, which aim to improve sensorimotor control and achieve compensatory functional stability (also called dynamic stability). Pain neuroscience education will take an active, person-centered approach through their own fear-avoidance beliefs.

  • Neuromuscular exercise

    Other intervention

    The exercises follow neuromuscular principles, which aim to improve sensorimotor control and achieve compensatory functional stability (also called dynamic stability).

Treatment groups

57 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Neuromuscular exercise plus Pain neuroscience educationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Neuromuscular exerciseExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Usual careNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Brain function (peak frequency)

An analysis of the peak frequencies (the highest power frequency determined in the average of the windows as the local maximum (greater than its two neighboring windows) of the amplitude in a frequency range of 6-14 Hz will be applied.

Time frame
baseline, post-intervention (2 months after admission), follow-up four months after the intervention.
2

Brain function (power spectrum)

A global analysis of the power spectrum will be carried out, considered as the average of all the electrodes, which represents the synchronization between the neurons to generate the discharges. A topographic power analysis will also be performed for the Delta (0.1 - 4 Hz), theta (4 - 8 Hz), alpha (8 - 13 Hz) and beta (13 - 30 Hz) frequency bands.

Time frame
baseline, post-intervention (2 months after admission), follow-up four months after the intervention.

Secondary outcomes

1

Pain pressure-threshold

A digital algometer (WAGNER FDX10) will be used to measure pressure pain sensitivity. The average of three measurements will be used. Patients will be evaluated lying supine in a comfortable position according to the area to be evaluated. It will be performed at two test sites on the affected knee(s) (3 cm medial and lateral to the midpoint of the medial and lateral edge of the patella, respectively) and will also be applied to a distant site on the ipsilateral carpal extensor radialis longus (5 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle).

Time frame
baseline, post-intervention (2 months after admission), follow-up four months after the intervention.
2

Pain intensity

The pain intensity will be measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which consists of a 10 cm straight line with two labels, at one end "no pain" and at the other "the worst possible pain" where the patient will draw a vertical mark indicating your pain level. The pain intensity at rest and during activity in the last 7 days will be considered.

Time frame
baseline, post-intervention (2 months after admission), follow-up four months after the intervention.
3

Disability

Disability will be assessed with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) questionnaire. It consists of 24 questions divided into 3 domains: pain, stiffness and physical function with 5, 2 and 17 questions, respectively. Each question is scored on a Likert scale of 0-4, corresponding to the intensity levels of none, slight, moderate, severe and extreme pain. A higher WOMAC score indicates worse health status.

Time frame
baseline, post-intervention (2 months after admission), follow-up four months after the intervention.
4

Fear-avoidance beliefs

Fear-avoidance beliefswill be evaluated with the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). This questionnaire consists of 2 subscales with 16 items in total 70. It is rated on a 7-point Likert scale (0=strongly disagree to 6=strongly agree).

Time frame
baseline, post-intervention (2 months after admission), follow-up four months after the intervention.

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: