Effectiveness of Laser Therapy for Pain Relief From Chronic Wounds in Adults in Guaviare

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversidad Nacional de Colombia

About this trial

Traditionally, the clinical management of chronic wounds has concentrated primarily on tissue closure, leaving persistent pain under-addressed. Discomfort during routine dressing changes is often worsened by tissue trauma. Even with standard pain medications and gentle dressing procedures, patients in Guaviare, Colombia, continue to suffer from unmet pain management needs. To bridge this gap, Low-Level Laser Therapy (photobiomodulation) offers a nurse-driven, non-pharmacological complementary option designed to target pain directly and enhance overall quality of life.

This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy added to standard care, compared to standard care alone, for the relief of pain experienced by patients with chronic wounds during nursing consultations at a wound care clinic in a healthcare institution in San José del Guaviare, Colombia.

The study employs a pragmatic randomized crossover design (AB/BA), enabling each participant to serve as their own control and increasing statistical efficiency. Participants will randomly receive both treatments-laser therapy combined with usual care, as well as usual care on its own-separated by a four-day washout period.

Key evaluation criteria include decreases in pain intensity and its interference with daily activities, alongside gains in perceived pain relief and overall patient satisfaction. The resulting data will be evaluated using Linear Mixed Models, analyzing the cohort through complementary Intention-to-Treat (ITT) and Per-Protocol (PP) framework approaches.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults aged 18 years or older.

Presence of a chronic wound, operationally defined as any lesion that does not show a reduction of at least 20% in size after 2 weeks of documented optimal conventional treatment.

Adults reporting a baseline score of ≥4 on the numerical pain scale for wound-related pain at the time of previous dressing removal. This threshold will be verified prior to treatment sequence assignment.

Voluntary agreement to participate and signing of the informed consent form.

Disqualifiers

Individuals who decide to withdraw from the study at any time.

Individuals scheduled for surgery within the next 7 to 15 days.

Individuals with psychiatric or neurological diagnoses that interfere with higher-level cognitive function, preventing comprehension of informed consent and the ability to provide the self-reports necessary for data collection.

Adults with malignant neoplastic wounds (an absolute contraindication for LLLT due to the risk of cellular biostimulation).

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • low-level laser therapy added to usual care.

    Other intervention

    low-level laser therapy added to usual care

Treatment groups

32 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ABOther 1 intervention
Group B: BAOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change From Pre-Procedure to Post-Procedure in Pain Intensity Score on the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Numeric Rating Scale

Pain intensity evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) component of the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) / Cuestionario Breve del Dolor - Forma Corta (CBD-FC). The scale ranges from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst imaginable pain"). Higher scores represent a worse outcome (greater pain severity). A reduction of at least 2 points is defined as the Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID).

Time frame
Evaluated pre-procedure (upon removal of previous dressing), intra-procedure, immediate post-procedure, and at 24-hour post-procedure telephone follow-up during each of the 4 nursing consultations in the crossover study.

Secondary outcomes

1

Pain Interference Score on the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)

Impact of pain on daily functioning across 7 items (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life) using the Pain Interference Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF). Each item is scored on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 ("does not interfere") to 10 ("completely interferes"). The outcome is reported as the mean interference score across the 7 items (range 0 to 10). Higher scores represent a worse outcome (greater functional interference).

Time frame
Baseline and 24 hours post-procedure following each of the 4 nursing consultations in the crossover study.
2

Proportion of Participants Reporting Pain Improvement on a Single-Item Categorical Scale

Participant's immediate perception of change in pain severity post-procedure, evaluated through a single-item categorical question with three mutually exclusive responses: "Improved", "Remained the same", or "Worsened". Reported as the percentage of participants selecting the "Improved" category, which represents a better outcome (clinical success).

Time frame
Immediately at consultation closure and at 24-hour post-procedure telephone follow-up for each of the 4 consultations
3

Participant Satisfaction Score on an Ad Hoc 5-Point Likert Scale

Subjective evaluation of participant satisfaction regarding nursing care interventions for pain relief, measured on an ad hoc 5-point Likert Scale. Response categories range from 1 ("Very Unsatisfied") to 5 ("Very Satisfied"). Higher scores represent a better outcome (greater satisfaction). Treatment success is defined as scores of 4 ("Satisfied") or 5 ("Very Satisfied").

Time frame
Evaluated immediately at the end of each nursing consultation, across all 4 consultations.
4

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed

Active surveillance of adverse events (e.g., mild erythema, transient pain increase, heat sensation, blistering, photosensitivity) assessed. Reported as the total count and percentage of participants who experience at least one adverse event categorized by severity (Grade 1/Mild, Grade 2/Moderate, Grade 3+/Severe). Lower counts represent a better outcome (greater intervention safety).

Time frame
Continuously during each in-person procedure and at 24-hour post-procedure telephone follow-up across all 4 consultations.

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Lead sponsor

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation

Collaborator

Call for Proposals 15 by the Department of Guaviare.

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: