Effectiveness of Three Different Irrigation Methods During a Root Canal Treatment

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-50
SponsorPakistan Institute of Medical Sciences

About this trial

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of three root canal irrigation techniques-Conventional Needle Irrigation (CNI), Side-Vented Needle (SVN), and Ultrasonic Irrigation (UI)-in achieving irrigant penetration into the apical third of the root canal. Since conventional irrigation often fails to adequately clean complex root canal anatomy, the study evaluates whether activation methods improve irrigant penetration. A randomized controlled trial will compare these three techniques using extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars. A radiopaque dye mixed with sodium hypochlorite will be used to measure irrigant penetration on digital radiographs, and the results will be statistically analyzed to determine the most effective irrigation method.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Straight Canals

Single Rooted 1st and 2nd mandibular premolars with closed apices

Disqualifiers

Mandibular premolars with open apices

Mandibular premolars with curved or calcified canals

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Conventional Needle
  • Side Vented Needle
  • Ultrasonic Irrigation

Treatment groups

105 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations