Effectiveness of Ventilation Modes in Intensive Care: A Comparison of Mandatory Minute Ventilation and Synchronized Intermittant Mandatory Ventilation Using Bioelectrical Impedance Tomography

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorHarran University

About this trial

Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (SIMV) is a commonly used ventilatory mode available in many modern ventilators, frequently applied in intensive care units for patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. SIMV delivers a preset tidal volume or pressure at a predetermined respiratory rate and synchronizes with the patient's spontaneous breathing efforts, thereby enhancing patient-ventilator interaction and contributing to rehabilitation.

Mandatory Minute Ventilation (MMV) is a hybrid mode combining features of SIMV and Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV), guaranteeing a preset minute ventilation (tidal volume × respiratory rate). It synchronizes support based on the patient's spontaneous efforts and compensates in cases of insufficient minute ventilation.

Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive, radiation-free imaging technique that enables real-time monitoring of pulmonary ventilation and perfusion by applying alternating electrical currents through surface electrodes. EIT has demonstrated strong correlation with findings from computed tomography, nitrogen washout, PET, and SPECT imaging modalities.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of MMV compared to SIMV in mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically stable adult patients (\>18 years old) in the intensive care unit. Patients must not require vasopressors, have a FiO₂ ≤ 60%, PEEP ≤ 8 cmH₂O, or receive neuromuscular blocking agents.

Patients will be monitored under both SIMV and MMV modes, separated by a 12-hour interval. To minimize carry-over effects, a one-hour washout period will be implemented before data collection with EIT. Key parameters including PO₂/FiO₂ ratio, PaCO₂, and EtCO₂ will be assessed. The sequence of ventilatory mode application will follow a crossover study design.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Disqualifiers

None

Trial population

Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the intensive care unit who are intubated and receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. All participants are hemodynamically stable and not receiving vasopressors, high levels of PEEP, or neuromuscular blockers at the time of enrollment.

Trial design

Design model

Case-crossover

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • No investigational intervention

    Other intervention

    No investigational intervention. Patients will be observed under standard ventilation modes (SIMV and MMV) as part of routine care.

Treatment groups

25 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: ICU Patients1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in Regional Ventilation Distribution Measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)

Comparison of regional lung ventilation patterns between SIMV and MMV modes in mechanically ventilated ICU patients, assessed by EIT imaging.

Time frame
Within 1 hour after initiation of each ventilation mode (SIMV and MMV)

Secondary outcomes

1

PO₂/FiO₂ Ratio (Oxygenation Index)

Arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO₂) divided by fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂), used to assess oxygenation efficiency under each ventilation mode.

Time frame
Measured within 1 hour of each mode (SIMV and MMV)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.