Effectiveness Testing of a Videogame Intervention (No Baby No) to Decrease Contraception Non-use Among Adolescents.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age15-20
SponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell University

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a videogame compared to an attention/time control at reducing contraceptive non-use among adolescents.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Male or Female

Age15-20 at the time of enrollment

Able to speak and read English or Spanish

Have a smart phone (to scan QR code) or personal email account (to take screening questionnaire)

Disqualifiers

Age less than 15 or older than 20

Unable to speak and read English or Spanish

Do not have a smart phone or personal email account

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Videogame Intervention

    Other intervention

    No Baby No video game

  • Commercial game control

    Other intervention

    Commercial video game

Treatment groups

850 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: No Baby No Videogame InterventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Commercial game controlSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in mean frequency of participants' contraception non-use over the last 3 months.

Change in mean frequency of how often participants had penile/vaginal sex without a condom or birth control (pregnancy prevention), as self-reported on a customized survey with multiple-choice questions adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS). Scale values range from once to five or more times, with higher scores indicating a "worse" outcome. Scores are not being reported. At baseline, 2 weeks, and 9-month follow-up participants will be asked about the prior 3 months.

Time frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 9-month follow-up.
2

Change in mean frequency of participants' contraception non-use at last sexual encounter.

Change in mean frequency of how often participants had penile/vaginal sex without a condom or birth control (pregnancy prevention), as self-reported on a customized survey with multiple-choice questions adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS). Scale values range from once to five or more times, with higher scores indicating a "worse" outcome. Scores are not being reported. At baseline, 2 weeks, and 9-month follow-up participants will be asked about their last sexual encounter.

Time frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 9-month follow-up.
3

Change in participants' use of different types of contraception over the last 3 months.

A change in the mean use of less effective- (withdrawal, condom with or without spermicide, spermicide alone, fertility-based awareness, diaphragm, sponge), more effective- (pill, patch, vaginal ring, injection, intrauterine device, implant), and dual method (condom + other) contraception use during sexual encounters as self-reported on a customized survey with multiple-choice questions adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS). Participants select all forms of contraception that they used, with response options also including "No method was used to prevent pregnancy or STIs". At baseline, 2 weeks, and 9-month follow-up participants will be asked about the prior 3 months

Time frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 9-month follow-up.
4

Change in participants' use of different types of contraception at last sexual encounter.

A change in the mean use of less effective- (withdrawal, condom with or without spermicide, spermicide alone, fertility-based awareness, diaphragm, sponge), more effective- (pill, patch, vaginal ring, injection, intrauterine device, implant), and dual method (condom + other) contraception use during sexual encounters as self-reported on a customized survey with multiple-choice questions adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS). At baseline, 2 weeks, and 9-month follow-up participants will be asked about their last sexual encounter.

Time frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 9-month follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in participants' intentions for contraception non-use over the next year, as indicated by participants' mean responses to a survey question.

A change in the mean Likert-scale rating of participants on a survey item asking about their commitment to using contraception adapted from existing literature. At baseline, 2 weeks, and 9-month follow-up participants will be asked about their commitment to using contraception.

Time frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 9-month follow-up.
2

Change in participants' self-efficacy regarding condom use, as indicated by their mean rating on a survey question.

A change in the mean 5-point Likert-scale rating (anchor points "I strongly agree" to "I strongly disagree") on a survey item by participants reflecting their degree of confidence in correctly and consistently using condoms. The survey question is adapted from existing literature. At baseline, 2 weeks, and 9-month follow-up participants will be asked about their confidence in condom usage.

Time frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 9-month follow-up.
3

Change in participants' self-efficacy regarding contraception use, as indicated by their mean ratings on a survey question.

A change in the mean survey-item rating by participants reflecting their degree of confidence in correctly and consistently using contraception using a question adapted from existing literature. At baseline, 2 weeks, and 9-month follow-up participants will be asked about their confidence in contraception use.

Time frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 9-month follow-up.
4

Change in participants' perceptions of sexual risk (susceptibility to getting an STI), as indicated by their mean rating on a survey question.

A change in the mean survey-item rating by participants reflecting their perceived likelihood of getting an STI, based on contraception non-use, using a question adapted from existing literature. At baseline, 2 weeks, and 9-month follow-up participants will be asked of their perceived likelihood of getting an STI.

Time frame
Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 9-month follow-up.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Lead sponsor

Department of Health and Human Services

Collaborator