Effects of a Supervised Training Program on Functional Capacity in Patients With HF and Cardiorenal Syndrome

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorFundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia

About this trial

This is a prospective study, blinded for the evaluator, randomized (1:1) to receive standard management alone or combined with a training program (aerobic combined with strength exercises) that will be carried out in a single center. After randomization, patients will be clinically evaluated. The primary endpoint (peakVO2) will be assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing combined with echocardiography (echo-CPET) at 12 weeks. Ambulatory patients with heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome and functional class NYHA II-III will be enrolled. A sample size estimation \[alfa: 0.05, power: 80%, a 20% loss rate, and at least a delta change of mean peakVO2: +2,4 mL/kg/min (SD±2)\] of 26 patients (13 per arm) would be necessary to test our hypothesis.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients diagnosed with heart failure according to 2021 ESC guidelines for Heart Failure.

Evidence of cardiorenal syndrome, defined as coexistent very high risk chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 ml/min/1.73m2 or eGFR 30 to 44 ml/min/1.73m2 and Urine Albumin-Creatinine Ratio [uACR] >30 mg/g) or rapidly progressive CKD (loss of >5 ml/min/1.73m2 in one year).

Stable symptomatic heart failure patients (New York Heart Association functional class II-III/IV) during the last month.

Age ≥ 18 years old.

Disqualifiers

Inability to perform a valid baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test.

Significant primary severe valve disease that is considered the main symptom driver.

Effort angina or signs of ischemia during CPET.

Primary cardiomyopathies.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Supervised aerobic plus strength training

    Behavioral

    Supervised moderate to high-intensity interval aerobic training plus moderate to high-intensity strength training.

Treatment groups

26 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Usual careNo intervention 0 interventions
Group B: Supervised aerobic plus strenght trainingActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Peak oxygen consumption

Primary outcome: changes in peak oxygen consumption between groups at 12 weeks. Description: Peak oxigen consumption (also known as maximal functional capacity) will be evaluated using incremental and symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a semi-supine bicycle ergometer (coupled with stress echocardiography), beginning with a workload of 10 Watts and increasing gradually in a ramp protocol at 10-Watts increments every 1 minute. Peak oxygen consumption (PeakVO2) is defined as the highest value of VO2 during the last 20 seconds of exercise. Unit of measure of peak oxygen consumption: mL/kg/min (this is a directly reported measure from the cardiopulmonary exercise testing, not an aggregated or derived calculation).

Time frame
The investigators will evaluate peak oxygen consumption at baseline (week 0) and at week 12.

Secondary outcomes

1

Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire

The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire includes 23 items that map to 7 domains: symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life, and self-efficacy (the patient's understanding of how to manage their heart failure). All Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire domains are scaled from 0 to 100, where scores represent health status as follows: 0 to 24, very poor to poor; 25 to 49, poor to fair; 50 to 74, fair to good; and 75 to 100, good to excellent. A change of 5 points is considered to be a small but clinically important change, whereas changes of 10 and 20 points are considered moderate-to-large and large-to-very-large clinical changes.

Time frame
The investigators will evaluate Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire at baseline (week 0) and at week 12.
2

Chronotropic index

Secondary outcome: changes in chronotropic response between groups at 12 weeks. Description: Chronotropic index is an index calculated in a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing to assess heart rate response to exercise. The chronotropic index is evaluated by the following formula, including heart rate at peak effort, heart rate at rest and age. Chronotropic index: (peak heart rate-rest heart rate)/ \[220-age-rest heart rate)\]. The chronotropic index has no units of measure.

Time frame
The investigators will evaluate chronotropic index at baseline (week 0) and at week 12.

Other outcomes

1

Age

Age at the moment of assessment that will be used to further calculate chronotropic index. Units: years.

Time frame
The investigators will evaluate age at baseline (week 0) and at week 12.
2

Peak heart rate

Peak heart rate is defined as heart rate at the end of exercise of the maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and will be used to further calculate chronotropic index. Units: beats per minute.

Time frame
The investigators will evaluate peak heart rate at baseline (week 0) and at week 12.
3

Heart rate at rest

Heart rate at rest is defined as heart rate at the beginning of the maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and will be used to further calculate chronotropic index. Units: beats per minute.

Time frame
The investigators will evaluate heart rate at rest at baseline (week 0) and at week 12.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: