Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

About this trial

In a real-world setting, this study systematically evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of guselkumab (GUS) in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), encompassing multi-dimensional outcomes including clinical remission, biochemical remission, endoscopic remission, histologic healing, and intestinal ultrasound changes.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years.

Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis is established based on clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, colonoscopy, radiological imaging (CT or ultrasound), and histopathological examination.

Presence of moderate-to-severe disease activity, defined as a modified Mayo score (MMS) ≥ 5 points, accompanied by a rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 and a Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) ≥ 2.

Inadequate response or intolerance to at least one conventional therapy (5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, or immunosuppressants), as assessed by the investigator according to clinical practice.

Disqualifiers

Diagnosed with other intestinal diseases, such as Crohn's disease, intestinal tuberculosis, infectious colitis, ischemic colitis or other chronic intestinal inflammatory diseases;

If there is an active intestinal infection, and the fecal culture or pathogen test shows positive within 8 weeks before the study (including Clostridium difficile, cytomegalovirus, etc.), and the re-examination turns negative without any signs of persistent infection, a re-evaluation can be conducted.

Combined with severe infections, malignant tumors, severe liver and kidney dysfunction, or accompanied by active autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis, and Graves' disease that may interfere with disease assessment

Those who have undergone total colorectal resection or stoma surgery in the past and whose disease activity cannot be evaluated, or are expected to undergo major intestinal surgery during the study period;

Trial population

This study employs a prospective consecutive enrollment design to include patients with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis who are expected to receive guselkumab treatment at the study center based on clinical indications. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are as previously stated.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Guselkumab

    Drug

    All the patients receive GUS (IV) 200 mg induction therapy at weeks 0, 4, and 8, and who met the criteria for clinical symptom remission, biochemical remission, and improvement in intestinal ultrasound based on the clinical assessment at week 12, proceeded to receive GUS (SC) 100 mg every 8 weeks as maintenance therapy. Patients who did not meet the above criteria received GUS (SC) 200 mg every 4 weeks as maintenance therapy. At week 24, based on clinical and endoscopic evaluations, patients who achieved endoscopic remission were switched to GUS (SC) 100 mg every 8 weeks for maintenance, while those who did not achieve endoscopic remission continued to receive GUS (SC) 200 mg every 4 weeks for maintenance treatment.

Treatment groups

97 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Guselkumab treatment group1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

48-week endoscopic remission

Assessment was performed using the Mayo endoscopic subscore: endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in the Mayo endoscopic subscore by at least 1 point from baseline or a score of ≤1; endoscopic remission was defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0. For patients who completed the 48-week treatment, endoscopic scores were evaluated, and the number/proportion of patients achieving endoscopic remission was calculated.

Time frame
48 weeks
2

48-week histological remission

Investigators apply the Geboes score, and histological remission is defined as a Geboes score ≤ 2B.0. The Nancy Histological Index (NHI) is assessed concurrently, with histological remission defined as an NHI = 0 (indicating no active inflammation). Investigators performed histological scoring for patients who completed the 48-week treatment course and evaluated the number/proportion of patients achieving histological remission.

Time frame
48 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

12-week clinical remission

Clinical remission in UC is assessed using the partial Mayo score (pMayo) or PRO2. It's defined as either a pMayo score ≤ 2 with no individual subscore \> 1, or meeting the symptomatic remission criteria of PRO2 (indicating improvement in both stool frequency and rectal bleeding scores to the mild or normal range).

Time frame
12 weeks
2

12-week biochemical remission

1. CRP normalization (≤5 mg/L) or reduction by ≥50% from baseline. 2. Fecal calprotectin (FC) reduction to \<250 μg/g or reduction by ≥50% from baseline.

Time frame
12 weeks
3

12-week intestinal ultrasound response

Response to intestinal ultrasound (IUS) was defined as meeting both of the following criteria: 1) a decrease in bowel wall thickness (BWT) by ≥25% or a reduction of ≥1 mm from baseline; and 2) a reduction in blood flow signal (Limberg score) by ≥1 grade.

Time frame
12 weeks
4

24-week and 48-week intestinal ultrasound response

Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) remission was defined as meeting both of the following criteria: 1) bowel wall thickness (BWT) ≤ 3 mm; and 2) no detectable blood flow signal (Limberg grade 0).

Time frame
24 weeks; 48 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.