Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (tTIS) for Neuropathic Pain in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorTang-Du Hospital

About this trial

This is an open-label, single-arm, single-center prospective pilot study to assess the efficacy and safety of transcranial temperol interference stimulation in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) complicated by neuropathic pain in China.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients diagnosed with NMOSD in accordance with the criteria of the International Panel for Neuromyelitis Optica Diagnosis (IPND).

Patients were complicated with neuropathic pain, with a DN4 score ≥ 4.

NRS score for pain ≥ 4 points, and neuropathic pain has persisted for more than 3 months.

Patients receiving biological therapy and/or prednisone at a stable dose, with no adjustment of the treatment plan within 30 days before enrollment.

Disqualifiers

Subjects participating in other clinical studies.

Subjects who have used investigational drugs for pain control within 30 days before enrollment.

Subjects with a concurrent diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy.

Subjects with concurrent active central nervous system diseases.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • 10Hz tTIS (2-4mA) Intervention

    Device

    tTIS (10Hz envelope field, current intensity 2-4mA)

Treatment groups

12 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Transcranial Current Stimulation (tTIS) Targeting Ventral Posterolateral Nucleus for Pain TreatmentExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change from baseline in numerical rating scale (NRS) score

Patients are followed up and NRS score is determined. In general, the minimum and maximum scores of NRS are 0 and 10, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

Time frame
Baseline, immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment

Secondary outcomes

1

Change from baseline in visual analog scale (VAS) score

Patients are followed up and VAS score is determined. In general, the minimum and maximum scores of VAS are 0 and 10, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

Time frame
Baseline, immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment
2

Change from baseline in patient global impression of change (PGIC) score

Patients are followed up and PGIC score is determined. In general, the minimum and maximum scores of PGIC are 1 and 7, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

Time frame
Immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment
3

Change from baseline in short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) score

Patients are followed up and SF-MPQ score is determined. In general, the minimum and maximum scores of SF-MPQ are 0 and 45, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

Time frame
Baseline, immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment
4

Change from baseline in Penn spasm frequency scale (PSFS) score

Patients are followed up and PSFS score is determined. In general, spasm frequency and spasm severity are evaluated. The minimum and maximum scores of spasm frequency are 0 and 4, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome. The minimum and maximum scores of spasm severity are 1 and 3, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

Time frame
Baseline, immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.