Efficacy of an AI System in Training Endoscopists to Assess Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Via the EGGIM Score

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorQilu Hospital of Shandong University

About this trial

This prospective randomized controlled trial with a crossover design incorporated image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) videos demonstrating complete standardized examinations of five standard gastric areas (antrum greater curvature, antrum lesser curvature, incisura, corpus lesser curvature, and corpus greater curvature). Endoscopists were stratified by experience level and randomly assigned to either the AI-assisted scoring first group, which performed EGGIM scoring with AI assistance in the initial phase followed by conventional scoring after a washout period, or the conventional scoring first group, which completed the assessments in reverse order. The study primarily evaluated the training efficacy of the EGGIM-AI system for improving endoscopists' EGGIM scoring performance by comparing diagnostic accuracy metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity between groups at different study phases.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • AI-assisted EGGIM scoring

    Diagnostic test

    Endoscopists will evaluate the videos with the assistance of the AI system via EGGIM score.

  • Conventional EGGIM scoring

    Diagnostic test

    Endoscopists will evaluate the videos without the assistance of the AI system via EGGIM score.

Treatment groups

8 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: AI-assisted scoring first groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Conventional scoring first groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Efficacy of the EGGIM-AI system for improving endoscopists' EGGIM scoring performance

Diagnostic accuracy metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity between groups at different study phases.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Performance of EGGIM scoring by endoscopists with varying experience levels

Differences in AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of EGGIM scores between experienced and inexperienced endoscopists within each group at different phases.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.