About this trial
This prospective observational study evaluates the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and biomarker determination in the follow-up of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). Currently, computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the standard for follow-up, although it has disadvantages such as radiation exposure and the use of iodinated contrasts. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), free of radiation and nephrotoxicity, and biomarkers could reduce the need for CTA minimizing the associated risks. Biomarkers will be measured before and after EVAR and CEUS will be performed at various time points and compared with CTA results to validate concordance and effectiveness in detecting endoleaks and aneurysm remodeling. The objectives include determining the efficacy of these combined methods and establishing a follow-up protocol that reduces exposure to radiation and iodinated contrast agents.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
patients with AAA under follow-up who are going to be treated with EVAR.
signed informed consent to perform CTA, CEUS and for the determination of biomarkers.
Disqualifiers
patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms or ruptured aneurysm.
Trial population
Patients with AAA treated with EVAR will undergo a clinical evaluation prior to the procedure, assessing inclusion and exclusion criteria. A determination of biomarkers will be carried out to determine their values before the procedure, which will be carried out within 30 days of said assessment. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be studied prospectively to assess the effectiveness of biomarker levels along with CEUS to detect endoleaks.
Trial design
Cohort
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
CTA
Diagnostic testThe levels of biomarkers are determined before (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after the implantation of the stent (24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and at 1 year), along with the performance of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Additionally, a follow-up CT angiography is performed to validate the concordance, that is, to assess if there are changes in the biomarker values determined one month after the implantation of the stent compared to the baseline values that may suggest the presence of complications (endoleaks, infection, thrombosis, etc.).
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Biomarkers Levels for Endoleak Detection Post-EVAR Treatment
To determine if biomarker levels can detect endoleaks as a complication in patients treated for AAA, changes in biomarker levels will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Endoleak Biomarkers from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: * Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Markers: Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) (ng/mL) * Renal Function Markers: Cystatin C (mg/L) * Coagulation Markers: von Willebrand Factor (%), Factor VIII (IU/dL) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped into clinically relevant categories and analyzed as an independent measure within its respective category to assess its correlation with endoleak occurrence.
Biomarkers Levels for Thrombosis Detection Post-EVAR Treatment
To determine if biomarker levels detect thrombosis in AAA patients, changes will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Thrombosis Biomarkers from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: * Coagulation Markers: Prothrombin Time (PT) (seconds), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) (seconds), Derived Fibrinogen (mg/dL), Factor XIII (%) * Platelet Function Markers: PFA-100 COL/ADP (seconds), PFA-100 COL/EPI (seconds) * Anticoagulation Markers: Protein C (%), Protein S (%), Antithrombin (%) * Thrombophilia Markers: Lupus Anticoagulant (Presence/Absence), Activated Protein C Resistance ((+/-)), Prothrombin G20210A Mutation ((+/-)), Factor V Leiden Mutation (G1691A) ((+/-)) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped into clinically relevant categories and analyzed as an independent measure within its respective category to track changes and assess their correlation with thrombosis.
Biomarkers Levels for Infection Detection Post-EVAR Treatment
To determine if biomarker levels can detect infection as a complication in patients treated for AAA, changes in biomarker levels will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Infection Biomarkers from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: \- Inflammatory Markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (mg/L); Procalcitonin (ng/mL); IL-6 (pg/mL); IL-8 (pg/mL); TNF-α (pg/mL); Serum Calprotectin (µg/mL) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped as an inflammatory marker and analyzed as an independent measure to track changes and assess its correlation with infection.
Biomarker Levels for Prosthesis-Related Complication Detection Post-EVAR Treatment
To determine whether biomarker levels can detect complications such as displacement, dislocation, and plication of the prosthesis in patients treated for AAA, changes in biomarker levels will be compared to baseline values and subsequent assessments. Outcome Measure: Change in Biomarkers Related to Prosthesis Issues from baseline to 1 year. Biomarkers and Units of Measure: * Lipid Metabolism Markers: Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) (mg/dL), Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (mg/dL) * Hematological Markers: Reticulocytes (10³/mL) * Coagulation Markers: Quick Index (%) * Autoimmune Markers: Anticardiolipin Antibodies (IgG/IgM) (GPL/MPL units) Analysis: Each biomarker will be grouped into clinically relevant categories and treated as an independent measure within its respective category.
Secondary outcomes
Cost-Effectiveness of Biomarker Measurements in AAA Follow-Up Post-EVAR treatment
Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of biomarker determination in the follow-up of AAA patients treated with EVAR, using a Health Economic Evaluation framework. * Units of Measure: Cost of biomarker tests (in euros). * Analysis Method: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) and Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA). Comments: The cost-effectiveness analysis will compare the costs of biomarker measurements to clinical outcomes such as detection and management of complications.
Cost-Effectiveness of Imaging (CEUS and CTA) in AAA Follow-Up Post-EVAR treatment
Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of imaging techniques (CEUS and CTA) for follow-up of AAA patients treated with EVAR. * Units of Measure: Cost per imaging session (in euros). * Analysis Method: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) and Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA). Comments: The cost-effectiveness of CEUS and CTA will be assessed in relation to clinical outcomes, like the detection and management of complications.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.