Efficacy of Collagen Sponge on Palatal Wound Healing

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-70
SponsorThe Dental Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

About this trial

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of collagen sponge and gelatin sponge on the palatal wound healing and postoperative pain following gingival graft harvesting.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Clinical indications utilizing free gingival grafts or de-epithelialized gingival grafts to treat either insufficient keratinized tissue or gingival recession defects

Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score lower than 20%

Disqualifiers

Smoking

Pregnancy or lactation

Untreated periodontal disease

Severe systemic conditions that contraindicate surgery (diabetes, heart disease, cancer etc.)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Palatal soft tissue graft harvesting

    Procedure/Surgery

    After local anaesthesia, a horizontal incision 2 mm apically from the gingival margin will be carried out using a #15C blade. The standardized rectangular graft with a thickness of 1.5 mm will be harvested from distal aspect of canine till first molar. The graft will be lifted and separated using tissue forceps and a blade till it is free from all sides.

Treatment groups

32 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Gelatin SpongeActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Collagen SpongeExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

epithelialization of the palatal wound evaluated by hydrogen peroxide test

The appearance of bubbles means the wound is not completely epithelialized. The result will be recorded as a dichotomous variable (yes/no).

Time frame
at 1 week
2

epithelialization of the palatal wound evaluated by hydrogen peroxide test

The appearance of bubbles means the wound is not completely epithelialized. The result will be recorded as a dichotomous variable (yes/no).

Time frame
at 2 weeks
3

epithelialization of the palatal wound evaluated by hydrogen peroxide test

The appearance of bubbles means the wound is not completely epithelialized. The result will be recorded as a dichotomous variable (yes/no).

Time frame
at 3 weeks
4

epithelialization of the palatal wound evaluated by hydrogen peroxide test

The appearance of bubbles means the wound is not completely epithelialized. The result will be recorded as a dichotomous variable (yes/no).

Time frame
at 1 month

Secondary outcomes

1

postoperative pain

using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable)

Time frame
at day 1
2

postoperative pain

using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable)

Time frame
at day 3
3

postoperative pain

using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable)

Time frame
at day 7
4

consumption of analgesics

to answer the following question: Did you take any analgesics due to the palatal pain since the procedure was completed?

Time frame
at 1 week

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.