Efficacy of Oxalidine and Sufentanil in Strabismus Correction

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age3-60
SponsorHenan Provincial People's Hospital

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the anesthetic effect of oxalidine and sufentanil in strabismus surgery through a non inferiority test, including analgesic efficacy, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, postoperative recovery quality and the incidence of adverse reactions. . This study will provide a new evidence-based basis for the application of opioids in ophthalmic short surgery, and may improve the perioperative experience of patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

The patients to be treated with strabismus correction under general anesthesia are 3-60 years old, regardless of gender.

Disqualifiers

Those who are allergic to oxalidine, sufentanil or any of the ingredients in their preparations.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Oliceridine

    Drug

    After entering the room, the patient was intravenously injected with oselidine at a dose of 0.08mg/kg during anesthesia induction

  • Sulfentanil

    Drug

    After the patient entered the room, sufentanil was injected intravenously during anesthesia induction with a dose of 0.4 μ g/kg

Treatment groups

290 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Oliceridine groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Sufentanil groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Adequate rate of intraoperative analgesia

Definition: No body movement (body movement score ≤ 1) and no need for additional analgesics during surgical skin cutting and eye muscle traction. Evaluation method: Physical activity score (0-3 points): 0=none; 1=Mild (does not interfere with surgery); 2=Obvious (requiring intervention); 3=Severe (pause surgery).

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 day
2

Success rate of initial insertion of laryngeal mask

One time insertion of laryngeal mask without adjustment/replacement, and good airway sealing (normal ETCO ₂ waveform)

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 day

Secondary outcomes

1

Ocular Heart Reflex (OCR) incidence rate

HR decline\>20% may require atropine intervention.

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 day
2

Hemodynamic fluctuations

Hypotension (MAP\<65 mmHg or decrease from baseline\>30%), hypertension (MAP\>100 mmHg)

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 day
3

Respiratory inhibition:

SpO ₂\<90% or ETCO ₂\>50 mmHg

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 day
4

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (0-24h)

Rating: 0=none; 1=Mild (no need for treatment); 2=Moderate (requires antiemetic medication); 3=Severe (repeated vomiting)

Time frame
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1 day

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: