Efficacy of Trans-auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery in Stroke Survivors

ConditionStroke
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco

About this trial

The aim of this clinical trial is to determine if trans-auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is effective in improving upper extremity function in stroke survivors. The primary objectives include: Investigating whether taVNS improves motor function in stroke survivors. The secondary objectives include: Assessing any potential side effects associated with the method. Investigating taVNS effects on daily routine functions and spasticity Researchers will conduct a comparative analysis between taVNS and a sham procedure (which mimics the stimulation without any actual effect) to assess its effectiveness. Participants in the trial will: Undergo taVNS combined with physical therapy or a sham procedure with physical therapy daily over a two-week period.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

Patients with any contraindication to taVNS, peripheral upper extremity injuries, use of medication affecting cortical excitability in the past 3 months, use of botulinum toxin in the past 3 months, presence of any other neurological disorder, or significant cognitive deficits.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Active taVNS

    Device

    Protocol uses a 25 Hz frequency with 500 μs pulse width in biphasic configuration, operating at a 1:1 duty cycle with current intensity set to the maximum tolerable level without inducing pain. The total stimulation duration is 60 minutes. The stimulation is combined with physical therapy focused on upper extremity function.

  • Sham taVNS

    Device

    Physical therapy focused on upper extremity function with masking for transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Active transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation stimulation (taVNS)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Sham transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation stimulation (s-tAVNS)Sham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Upper extremity Motor Function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity)

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) will be used to evaluate motor impairment and recovery of the paretic upper extremity. It consists of items from sections III and IV, assessing motor function, coordination, and speed, with a maximum score of 66 points. Higher scores indicate lower motor impairment. A minimal clinically important difference (mCID) is defined as a change (Δ) of 5 or more points between baseline and post-intervention scores.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (day 5) and post-intervention (day 10)

Secondary outcomes

1

Manual Dexterity (Box and Block Test)

The Box and Block Test (BBT) will assess manual dexterity of the paretic upper extremity. It counts the number of wooden blocks (2.5 x 2.5 x 2.5 cm) transferred from one compartment to another over a central divider within one minute. The minimal detectable change (MDC) is defined as a difference of 5 blocks per minute.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (day 5) and post-intervention (day 10)
2

Independence (Functional Independence Measure)

The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) assesses the level of independence through motor and cognitive subscales. Each item is scored from 1 to 7. Total score classifications: complete dependence (18-45), moderate independence (46-99), and complete independence (100-126). The MDC is defined as 17 points for the motor section, 3 points for the cognitive section, and 22 points for the total score.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (day 5) and post-intervention (day 10)
3

Spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale)

The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) will assess spasticity in finger, wrist, elbow, and shoulder flexors of the paretic upper extremity. It uses a 6-point scale (0 to 5) to quantify muscle tone. The minimal clinically important difference (mCID) is defined as a reduction of at least one point in spasticity score.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 0), mid-intervention (day 5) and post-intervention (day 10)
4

Health-Related Quality of Life (Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale)

The Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) assesses stroke-related quality of life across 12 domains, using 49 items. Scores range from 49 to 245, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. The MDC is 4.7 points for the total score, 2.1 for the physical subscore, and 2.8 for the psychosocial subscore.

Time frame
Baseline (day 0), mid-intervention (day 5), post-intervention (day 10)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Lead sponsor

Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco

Collaborator

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Collaborator