About this trial
The goal of this trial is to learn if one mode of mechanical ventilation (i.e. machine to help with breathing) is better than another in children who need help from a machine to breathe. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* How hard do children need to work to breathe when they are using different types of modes of mechanical ventilation? * Evaluate which mode of mechanical ventilation performs better when the patient is clinically awake enough to start breaths
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Consent provided
Aged: birth to 18 years of age
Invasively mechanically ventilated and expected to remain intubated for ≥ 6 hours, in the ventilator weaning phase.
Disqualifiers
Contraindication for esophageal catheter placement such as esophageal repair (e.g. esophageal surgery or esophageal varices)
On Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
Undergoing assessment for brain death or brain death confirmed
<24 hrs post cardiac arrest
Trial design
Crossover
Treatments tested in this trial
Pressure Control Mode
DeviceIn pressure control mode every breath is controlled by the ventilator, including when the breaths are delivered. This mode is typically used when patients are sedated and unable to breathe on their own.
Pressure Support Mode
DeviceIn pressure support mode every breath is initiated and controlled by the patient. This mode is used when patients are awake enough to take all breaths on their own.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Average effort of breathing
Muscular pressure or Pmus (calculated from DPes and using the chest wall compliance of the participant and measured by specific software \[FluxReview\]) during the assisted modes. For each patient, the change in Pmus from SIMV to PSV and from SIMV to PCV will be computed. The within-patient difference between these changes will be summarized in terms of median and interquartile range, and assessed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Secondary outcomes
Dyssynchrony rate quantified by specific software (FluxReview)
Comfort quantified by RASS sedation and comfort scale. Dyssynchrony events will be summarized as the proportion of breath with any dyssynchrony per patient and period. To account for baseline variability, comparisons between PCV and PSV will be adjusted for each patient's SIMV baseline dyssynchrony. Similar to Pmus analyses, median, interquartile ranges and p-values from a Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be reported.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: