Eliciting Informed Goals of Care in Elderly Patients

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age80+
SponsorRoyal Victoria Hospital, Canada

About this trial

Patient-centered medical care considers a patient's values and goals for their health and well-being. Healthcare providers use this information to formulate a medical care plan that is aligned with these expectations. This shared-decision making process should occur with every medical decision, but it is especially important whenever decisions about end-of-life care are being considered. Eliciting patient preferences about resuscitation and life-support treatments in the event of life-threatening illnesses are considered to be a standard of excellent and appropriate medical care. Unfortunately, these discussions don't happen consistently and even when they do occur, are rarely ideal. The consequences can be devastating, often resulting in the delivery of unwanted medical care that can be associated with significant physical and mental suffering among patients and their families. In response to this problem, the investigators developed a novel tool to help guide these difficult conversations between healthcare providers and patients. The investigators previously tested this tool in a small group of hospitalized patients who found it acceptable and helpful. In this larger study, the investigators will compare how effective this tool is compared to usual care in ensuring hospitalized patients have their treatment preferences identified, documented and result in end-of-life care that is consistent with their preferences.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Hospitalized patients ≥ 80 years old with an acute medical or surgical condition admitted to any hospital ward

Previously or currently documented CODE STATUS preferences include any life sustaining therapies

Duration of admission ≥ 24 hours

English speaking, or translator present

Disqualifiers

Treating physician, patient, or substitute decision maker declines

Documented resuscitation preferences for comfort or supportive care

New diagnosis of life-limiting illness on this hospital admission, for example, new diagnosis of metastatic cancer

Clinically unstable, admitted to an intensive care unit, or currently receiving acute life support treatment (mechanical ventilation, acute dialysis, or inotropic/vasopressor support)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • GOCD Tool

    Other intervention

    Web-based tool with 4 components; pre-admission health status; current illness prognosis for hospital survival; in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest prognosis; values and goals of care

  • Usual care

    Other intervention

    Attending physicians responsible for GOCD during hospitalization using their usual approaches

Treatment groups

1,200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: GOCD ToolExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: usual careActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

ICU-related health care utilization

total number of ventilator, ICU, and dialysis days

Time frame
From the time of index hospital admission until hospital discharge or death, up to 12 months after the time of index hospital admission
2

ICU-related health care utilization

total number of hospital, ventilator, ICU, and dialysis days

Time frame
12 months after admission from index hospital admission

Secondary outcomes

1

CODE STATUS resuscitation preferences

Distribution of resuscitation preferences documented in CODE STATUS

Time frame
At the time of index hospital discharge or death during the index hospitalization, up to 12 months after the time of index hospital admission
2

Change in CODE STATUS preferences

Proportion of patients who change documented CODE STATUS preferences

Time frame
At the time of index hospital discharge or death during the index hospitalization, up to 12 months after the time of index hospital admission
3

Resuscitation level designation

proportion of patients with completed resuscitation preferences identified

Time frame
At the time of index hospital discharge or death, up to 12 months after the time of index hospital admission
4

Distribution of ICU-related days of health care utilization

compare empirical distributions of total days of health care utilization

Time frame
From index hospital admission until hospital discharge or death in hospital, assessed up to 12 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Royal Victoria Hospital, Canada

Lead sponsor

Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre

Collaborator