About this trial
Patient-centered medical care considers a patient's values and goals for their health and well-being. Healthcare providers use this information to formulate a medical care plan that is aligned with these expectations. This shared-decision making process should occur with every medical decision, but it is especially important whenever decisions about end-of-life care are being considered. Eliciting patient preferences about resuscitation and life-support treatments in the event of life-threatening illnesses are considered to be a standard of excellent and appropriate medical care. Unfortunately, these discussions don't happen consistently and even when they do occur, are rarely ideal. The consequences can be devastating, often resulting in the delivery of unwanted medical care that can be associated with significant physical and mental suffering among patients and their families. In response to this problem, the investigators developed a novel tool to help guide these difficult conversations between healthcare providers and patients. The investigators previously tested this tool in a small group of hospitalized patients who found it acceptable and helpful. In this larger study, the investigators will compare how effective this tool is compared to usual care in ensuring hospitalized patients have their treatment preferences identified, documented and result in end-of-life care that is consistent with their preferences.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Hospitalized patients ≥ 80 years old with an acute medical or surgical condition admitted to any hospital ward
Previously or currently documented CODE STATUS preferences include any life sustaining therapies
Duration of admission ≥ 24 hours
English speaking, or translator present
Disqualifiers
Treating physician, patient, or substitute decision maker declines
Documented resuscitation preferences for comfort or supportive care
New diagnosis of life-limiting illness on this hospital admission, for example, new diagnosis of metastatic cancer
Clinically unstable, admitted to an intensive care unit, or currently receiving acute life support treatment (mechanical ventilation, acute dialysis, or inotropic/vasopressor support)
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
GOCD Tool
Other interventionWeb-based tool with 4 components; pre-admission health status; current illness prognosis for hospital survival; in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest prognosis; values and goals of care
Usual care
Other interventionAttending physicians responsible for GOCD during hospitalization using their usual approaches
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
ICU-related health care utilization
total number of ventilator, ICU, and dialysis days
ICU-related health care utilization
total number of hospital, ventilator, ICU, and dialysis days
Secondary outcomes
CODE STATUS resuscitation preferences
Distribution of resuscitation preferences documented in CODE STATUS
Change in CODE STATUS preferences
Proportion of patients who change documented CODE STATUS preferences
Resuscitation level designation
proportion of patients with completed resuscitation preferences identified
Distribution of ICU-related days of health care utilization
compare empirical distributions of total days of health care utilization
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Royal Victoria Hospital, Canada
Lead sponsor
Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre
Collaborator