Empowering Adolescents and Young Adults With Sickle Cell Disease as Partners in Treatment Decision Making (EMPOWER-AYA)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age15+
SponsorNemours Children's Clinic

About this trial

This study will evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of a shared decision making intervention for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with sickle cell disease (SCD). 60 AYAs with SCD ages 15-25 and their caregivers and 8 SCD providers will participate in the pilot pragmatic trial. AYAs, caregivers, and providers will be recruited from Nemours Children's Hospital, Delaware (NCH-DE), Nemours Children's Hospital in Orlando, FL (NCH-ORL), and Nemours Children's Health at Wolfson Children's Hospital in Jacksonville, FL (NCH-JAX). NCH-DE participants (n=30) will receive the SDM intervention including a virtual reality patient health education component, whereas NCH-ORL and NCH-JAX participants (n=30) will receive the SDM intervention with standard patient education materials (print, video). SCD providers will be trained to use the toolkit components and will introduce decision aids during an outpatient clinic visit for AYAs who are candidates for one or more disease-modifying therapies.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients diagnosed with SCD ages 15-25 years receiving treatment at Nemours and their caregivers will be included. Patients must be deemed candidates for initiation of one or more disease-modifying therapies by their SCD healthcare provider.

Nemours SCD healthcare providers will also be included.

English language fluency is a requirement for all participants.

Disqualifiers

Patients/ caregivers who previously participated in usability testing of the intervention will be excluded.

Patients will also be excluded if they have history of seizures, if their medical status or cognitive functioning preclude completion of interviews, or if no legal guardian is available to provide consent (for patients < 18 years).

Providers still completing training will be excluded.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • SCD Shared Decision-Making Toolkit for AYAs - including VR

    Behavioral

    The SCD Shared Decision-Making Toolkit for AYAs (SDMT-AYA) targets multi-level barriers to uptake of disease-modifying therapies by providing technology-enhanced tools for: 1) clinicians (i.e., training in motivational interviewing, values elicitation, and cultural humility); 2) AYAs and caregivers (i.e., user-centered multimedia decision aids, including virtual reality, online (videos, animations, articles), and print materials); and 3) implementation (e.g., clinic audit and feedback strategies).

  • SCD Shared Decision-Making Toolkit for AYAs - without VR

    Behavioral

    The SCD Shared Decision-Making Toolkit for AYAs (SDMT-AYA) targets multi-level barriers to uptake of disease-modifying therapies by providing technology-enhanced tools for: 1) clinicians (i.e., training in motivational interviewing, values elicitation, and cultural humility); 2) AYAs and caregivers (i.e., user-centered multimedia decision aids, including online videos, animations, and articles as well as print materials); and 3) implementation (e.g., clinic audit and feedback strategies).

Treatment groups

68 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Shared Decision Making Toolkit including VRExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Shared Decision Making Toolkit without VRExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

Questionnaire assessing healthcare provider perspectives on acceptability of the intervention. Total score ranges from 4-20, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.

Time frame
Within 2 weeks post-intervention
2

Patient/Caregiver Satisfaction Questionnaire

Survey assessing patient/caregiver satisfaction with the intervention. Survey will be developed by the research team, and additional details will be included here once items and scoring are finalized.

Time frame
Within 2 weeks post-intervention
3

Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

Questionnaire assessing healthcare provider perspectives on the feasibility of the intervention. Total score ranges from 4-20, with higher scores indicating greater feasibility.

Time frame
Within 2 weeks post-intervention
4

Participant Recruitment Rate

Rate of participant enrollment and retention in the study

Time frame
Time of enrollment through study completion, approximately 12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Initiation of disease-modifying therapy

Proportion of patients who agree to initiate a disease-modifying therapy following use of the shared decision making intervention

Time frame
Within 6 months post-intervention

Other outcomes

1

Acute healthcare utilization

ED visits and hospitalizations for sickle cell-related complications during 6 months following the intervention

Time frame
Within 6 months post-intervention

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.