Enhancing Practical Competence in Physical Assessment Through Digital Video Feedback

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorChina Medical University Hospital

About this trial

This cluster randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital video feedback strategy in improving physical assessment skills, learning motivation, self-regulated learning, and anxiety among undergraduate nursing students. Approximately 80 second-year nursing students enrolled in a physical examination and assessment course will be assigned to either a digital video feedback intervention group or a traditional teaching control group using cluster randomization.

The intervention will be implemented in four physical assessment units, including head and neck/lymphatic assessment, musculoskeletal assessment, and two neurological assessment units. Students in the intervention group will record their physical assessment performance using a digital video system and receive structured feedback from peers and instructors. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, mid-course, and at the end of the course.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Second-year undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the Physical Examination and Assessment Practicum course at the participating university.

Disqualifiers

Students who are repeating the Physical Examination and Assessment Practicum course.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Digital Video Feedback Group

    Other intervention

    The digital video feedback intervention uses the SimCapture system to record students' physical assessment performance. Students practice selected physical assessment skills, including head and neck/lymphatic, musculoskeletal, and neurological assessments. Their recorded performances are reviewed by peers and instructors, who provide structured feedback based on standardized physical assessment evaluation criteria. Students review the feedback, modify their assessment techniques, and subsequently repeat the recording and feedback process.

  • Traditional Physical Assessment Teaching

    Other intervention

    Participants will receive traditional physical assessment instruction according to the standard course curriculum, including classroom instruction, instructor demonstration, and hands-on skills practice. Participants will also record and upload videos of their physical assessment skill performance as part of the course requirements. However, they will not participate in the structured video review and feedback activities provided to the Digital Video Feedback Group.

Treatment groups

80 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Traditional Teaching Control GroupActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Digital Video Feedback GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Physical Assessment Skill Performance

Physical assessment skill performance will be evaluated using the Physical Assessment Skills Performance Checklist. The checklist assesses students' ability to correctly perform essential physical assessment procedures. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical assessment skill performance.

Time frame
Baseline (Week 1), Week 9, and Week 18

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire Score

Learning strategies and motivational beliefs will be assessed using an adapted version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). The instrument uses a 7-point Likert scale and assesses motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies, including self-efficacy, intrinsic value, cognitive strategy use, and self-regulation. The total score ranges from 44 to 302. Higher scores indicate greater levels of learning motivation and self-regulated learning strategies.

Time frame
Baseline (Week 1), Week 9, and Week 18
2

ARCS-Based Learning Motivation Score

Learning motivation will be assessed using an Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction (ARCS)-based motivation scale assessing four domains: attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. The scale consists of 16 items, with each item rated from 1 to 5. The total score ranges from 16 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater learning motivation.

Time frame
Baseline (Week 1), Week 9, and Week 18
3

Anxiety

Anxiety will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A), ranging from 0 (not anxious at all) to 10 (extremely anxious), with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.

Time frame
Baseline (Week 1), Week 9, and Week 18

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

China Medical University Hospital

Lead sponsor

China Medical University, China

Sponsor institution

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: