Etomidate Combined With Propofol Versus Propofol for Sedation in High-Altitude Patients During Gastroscopy: a Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-70
SponsorRenJi Hospital

About this trial

One of the most common adverse events during sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy is hypoxemia, which can lead to serious consequences. When sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy is performed in high-altitude regions with thin air and lower atmospheric pressure, the risk of hypoxemia in patients significantly increases. Traditionally, propofol is the primary agent for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy, offering rapid onset and recovery. However, propofol has many side effects, the most important of which is inhibition of respiration and hypotension. Etomidate has less effect on respiration compared to propofol. But there are also adverse reactions of etomidate such as muscular tremor, nausea and vomiting. This study aims to explore whether the etomidate combined with propofol anesthesia method can reduce the risk of hypoxemia during sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy in high-altitude regions, compared to the traditional propofol anesthesia method .

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • etomidate combined with propofol

    Drug

    Patients initially received oxygen via nasal cannula at 5 L/min. All patients underwent routine noninvasive monitoring of blood pressure, ECG, and oxygen saturation. In the EP group, patients received 50 μg fentanyl, followed by a slow intravenous injection of a propofol-etomidate mixture (10 mL:20 mg etomidate + 10 mL:100 mg propofol) at 0.1-0.2 mL/kg. Supplemental doses of 0.05 mL/kg were administered as needed to maintain sedation throughout the procedure.

  • propofol

    Drug

    Patients initially received oxygen via nasal cannula at 5 L/min. All underwent routine noninvasive monitoring of blood pressure, ECG, and oxygen saturation. In the P group, 50 μg fentanyl was administered, followed by a slow intravenous injection of propofol (1-2 mg/kg) after 3 minutes. Supplemental doses of 0.5 mg/kg were administered as needed to maintain sedation throughout the procedure.

Treatment groups

732 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: EP groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: P groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The risk of hypoxemia

Time frame
during sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: