About this trial
Investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial assessing effectiveness of the Family Safety Check-In website on firearm storage practices. Prior to conducting the RCT, investigators will engage in a robust, participatory process of language adaptation to ensure the intervention meets the expressed needs of the large and growing proportion of parents in the United States who identify as Hispanic and speak primarily Spanish.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Parent or guardian of child aged 17 or younger
At least two adults living in the home
Firearms in household
Unsafe storage practices
Disqualifiers
Not a parent or guardian
Child is age 18 or older
No other adults living in the home
No firearms in household Safe storage practices
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Family Safety Check-In
BehavioralAn interactive web-based decision support tool that is tailored to different family structures and ages of children and adolescents in the home. It is designed to facilitate informed, value-consistent decision making about storage in which all adult family members are engaged in the decision-making process.
AAP Resource
BehavioralAmerican Academy of Pediatrics' informational resource about safe firearm storage for families.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Firearm storage practices
Adaptation of National Firearm Survey and Firearm Safety Among Children and Teens (FACTS) survey questions: Firearm storage will be measured on a continuum that reflects incremental improvements in safety across the storage of all firearms in the home.
Secondary outcomes
Satisfaction with storage practices
Satisfaction with Decision Scale: 6-item measure asking about satisfaction with received information, personal decision-making, decision-making related to value system, intent to carry out decision, sense of autonomy in decision-making, and general decision satisfaction. Responses are recorded on a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Feeling informed
Informed Subscale of Decisional Conflict Scale: 3-item measure assessing perceptions of feeling informed about a decision, such as knowing which options are available and knowing the risks/benefits of each option. Responses are recorded on a 5-point scale and typically converted to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate higher conflict and feeling less informed.
Clarity on what matters most
Values Clarity Sub-Scale of Decisional Conflict Scale: 3-item measure assessing clarity of personal values in decision-making such as being clear about which benefits and risks matter most. Responses are recorded on a 5-point scale and typically converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating higher conflict (less clarity) about personal values for benefits and risks.
Involvement in decision process
Decision Making Involvement Scale- Express subscale: 3-item measure assessing behaviors such as expressing an opinion or giving an opinion. Responses are recorded on a 4-point scale (not at all, a little bit, quite a bit, a lot), with higher scores indicating that the individual is actively participating in the decision by sharing their views.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: