About this trial
Comparison of routine postoperative stenting versus no stenting after ureterorenoscopy for ureteral stones to assess the necessity and impact on complication risk.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age 18 years or older
Patients with ureteral stones scheduled for ureteroscopy (URS) and stone removal
Previous pre-stenting
Informed Consent as documented
Disqualifiers
Complex ureteral conditions (e.g., known ureteral strictures)
Impacted stones
Solitary kidney
Patients with significant renal stones (>3mm)
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
No Double-J catheter insertion
Other interventionUreterorenoscopy without consecutive DJ-stent insertion.
Double-J catheter
Procedure/SurgeryTransurethral catheter insertion
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Postoperative pain assessment
Assessment of postoperative pain will be conducted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the study-specific mobile application HEATMAP (Byldr GmbH, Switzerland). The primary outcome is the difference between the pain scores recorded by the VAS and those recorded by the HEATMAP application at predefined postoperative time points \[both measured on a scale from 1-10, with higher scores indicating greater pain\].
Secondary outcomes
Length of stay [days]
Time from surgery to discharge in days \[d\]
Pain Assessment
Assessment of pain level via Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), scale \[1-10, higher scores indicates greater pain\]
Pain Management
Documentation of pain management \[according to the WHO Analgesic Ladder, 1-4, higher scores mean more intense pain treatment\]
Secondary need of double-J catheter
(Please note, this applies only for patients that where in the intervention group.) Patient received a double-J catheter, binary \[yes/no\]
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.