Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance and Impact on Clinical Outcomes of the NuRapid-CRISPR Pathogen Profile Assay in ICU Patients With Sepsis

ConditionSepsis
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorShanghai 10th People's Hospital

About this trial

This study is a prospective, multicenter, integrated trial designed to evaluate, from the perspectives of diagnostic performance and clinical utility, whether a diagnostic and treatment strategy based on the NuRapid-CRISPR rapid pathogen detection technology can reduce the 28-day all-cause mortality rate in patients with sepsis or septic shock in the ICU, compared to traditional pathogen culture.

The study consists of two parts:

1. Diagnostic Accuracy Study: For all enrolled sepsis patients, microbiological specimens will undergo concurrent blinded testing, with NuRapid-CRISPR serving as the test of interest and traditional pathogen culture as the reference standard. A prospective comparison will evaluate differences between the two methods in key metrics such as pathogen detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and turnaround time. 2. Clinical Utility Cohort Study: All patients will undergo NuRapid-CRISPR testing as part of routine clinical care. Based on whether the rapid results are adopted clinically to guide early antimicrobial therapy decisions, the cohort will naturally form an exposure group (early treatment adjustments based on NuRapid-CRISPR results) and a control group (treatment primarily based on traditional culture results or empirical therapy). The study will prospectively compare the two groups in terms of the time to optimize antimicrobial therapy, coverage of the initial treatment spectrum, and infection-related clinical outcomes.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years, length of stay in the ICU ≤ 24 hours;

Meets the Sepsis-3.0 diagnostic criteria (an increase in SOFA score of ≥2 points from baseline, and evidence of infection);

Clinically suspected sepsis or septic shock; the pathogen is unknown; the clinical plan is to collect sterile or suitable specimens, such as blood, respiratory specimens, cerebrospinal fluid, and ascites, for microbiological testing;

Expected ICU stay of ≥48 hours and ability to complete at least 28 days of clinical follow-up;

Disqualifiers

At the time of admission, the patient had already received a definitive pathogen diagnosis (based on microbiological culture, reliable molecular testing, or serological evidence), and targeted antimicrobial therapy against that pathogen had been initiated for more than 48 hours;

Vital signs are extremely unstable; death is expected within 24 hours;

Patients with severe primary immunodeficiency (e.g., AIDS, active hematologic malignancies, post-transplantation of solid organs or hematopoietic stem cells, or long-term use of high-dose glucocorticoids [prednisone ≥ 20 mg/day or equivalent dose for more than 4 weeks] or other potent immunosuppressants);

Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • NuRapid-CRISPR Rapid Pathogen Detection Technology

    Diagnostic test

    Adjusting early-stage treatment based on NuRapid-CRISPR results.

  • Traditional pathogen culture

    Diagnostic test

    Primarily based on traditional cultivation methods or empirical treatment.

Treatment groups

396 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: NuRapid-CRISPRExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Pathogen cultureActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

28-day all-cause mortality rate

Death from any cause occurring between the date of randomization and day 28 (±2 days).In-hospital deaths: Recorded in real time through daily medical record reviews. Out-of-hospital deaths: Confirmed via a structured telephone follow-up conducted on Day 28 of enrollment. The telephone follow-up will use a standardized questionnaire and will be conducted by trained study coordinators.

Time frame
From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)

Secondary outcomes

1

Time to first targeted therapy

The time interval (in hours) from the time of enrollment to the first use of an antimicrobial agent effective against the final confirmed pathogen (based on conventional culture or clinical diagnosis).Calculated precisely by comparing the time of antibiotic prescription execution with the time of the final microbiology report.

Time frame
From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)
2

Rate of adequate initial treatment

The proportion of empirical antimicrobial regimens initiated within 24 hours of enrollment whose antimicrobial spectrum covers the ultimately identified pathogen.Conducted by infectious disease specialists based on the final microbiological diagnosis and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results.

Time frame
From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)
3

Length of stay in the ICU

Length of stay in the ICU.Extracted directly from discharge records in the hospital information system, accurate to the day.

Time frame
From the subject's admission to the ICU until their discharge from the ICU
4

Total length of stay

Total length of stay.Extracted directly from discharge records in the hospital information system, accurate to the day.

Time frame
From the subject's admission to the hospital until their final discharge

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Shanghai 10th People's Hospital

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine

Collaborator

Yangpu District Central Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University

Collaborator

Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: