Evaluation of an Electric Stimulator for Medical Use by Personal (LRTPM1) for Visual Function in Early to Intermediate Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age50+
SponsorNu Eyne Co., Ltd.

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an electric stimulator for medical use by personal (LRTPM1) in patients with early to intermediate dry age-related macular degeneration.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

* Does the investigational device improve visual function, as assessed by best corrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity? * What treatment-emergent adverse events occur during the study?

Participants will:

* Be randomized to receive either active stimulation or sham stimulation * Apply the assigned investigational device at home once daily for 30 minutes over a 12-week treatment period * Visit the study site for eye examinations and safety assessments * Return for a follow-up visit 4 weeks after the end of treatment

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Participants aged 50 years or older

Participants diagnosed with early or intermediate dry age-related macular degeneration

Participants with best corrected visual acuity measured by the ETDRS visual acuity chart of 20/200 or better and 20/30 or worse

Participants who have voluntarily decided to participate in the study and have provided written informed consent.

Disqualifiers

Participants with atrophy involving the foveal center with a diameter of 175 micrometers or greater in at least one eye, as observed by fundus examination or fundus autofluorescence imaging

Participants with exudative age-related macular degeneration in at least one eye, as observed by fundus examination or optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Participants with a history of intraocular injection therapy or macular laser treatment, including focal laser photocoagulation or photodynamic therapy

Participants with retinal or choroidal diseases other than early or intermediate age-related macular degeneration that may affect the study results, including diabetic retinopathy, retinal artery occlusion, retinal vein occlusion, central serous chorioretinopathy, optic neuritis, or uveitis

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation

    Device

    The active intervention uses transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) delivered by the investigational personal-use electric stimulator (LRTPM1). Electrodes are attached to the ocular and periocular area, and the device delivers pulsed electrical stimulation. Participants will apply the assigned device once daily for 30 minutes over a 12-week treatment period.

  • Sham Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation

    Device

    The sham device is identical in appearance to the active investigational device but does not provide active electrical stimulation. Participants will apply the assigned sham device once daily for 30 minutes over a 12-week treatment period.

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Experimental Group (Active Stimulation, n=20)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Control Group (Sham Stimulation, n=20)Sham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by ETDRS Letter Score

Change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart. BCVA will be recorded as an ETDRS letter score. Higher scores indicate better visual acuity.

Time frame
Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 16
2

Change in Contrast Sensitivity

Change from baseline in contrast sensitivity as measured using a contrast sensitivity chart at four spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree). Contrast sensitivity is recorded as a level value from 1 to 8, with higher recorded values indicating better ability to perceive contrast differences.

Time frame
Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 16

Secondary outcomes

1

Change From Baseline in Geographic Atrophy Maximum Diameter and Area on Fundus Autofluorescence

Change from baseline in the maximum diameter and area of geographic atrophy as assessed by fundus autofluorescence imaging.

Time frame
Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, Week 16
2

Change From Baseline in Drusen Area and Volume on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Change from baseline in drusen area and volume as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Time frame
Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 16
3

Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Score

Change from baseline in vision-related quality of life as assessed by the NEI VFQ-25. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better visual function.

Time frame
Baseline, Week 12
4

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring from the first investigational device application through Week 16. TEAEs include, but are not limited to, transient dizziness, drowsiness, skin redness, skin allergy, headache, pain and muscle spasms, ocular symptoms such as transient eye pain, ocular discomfort, and ocular hyperemia, and hypersensitivity reactions around the application site. Safety will be assessed through monitoring of vital signs, physical examinations, ophthalmic examinations, and adverse event reporting throughout the study period.

Time frame
Baseline through Week 16

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: