Evaluation of an Oral Care Programme for Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorGöteborg University

About this trial

This study will evaluate the effect of an intensified oral care programme on prevalence, severity and duration of mucositis in patients undergoing treatment for cancer in the head and neck region.

Patients in the control group get professional oral care once a week.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients scheduled to receive full dose of curative RT including major salivary glands in the radiation field

Disqualifiers

Patients with recurrent cancer

Patients with severe cognitive impairment.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Oral care programme

    Procedure/Surgery

    Professional oral care (dental hygienist), intensified oral care measures by the patient

Treatment groups

150 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: InterventionActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: ControlNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Oral mucositis

Reduced incidence of clinical mucositis assessed using Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (9 areas in the mouth are examined and signs of ulceration are scored; 0=no lesion,1= lesion \<1cm2, 2=lesion 1-3 cm2, 3=lesion \> 3 cm2 as well as erythema, which is scored as follows: 0=no erythema, 1= mild erythema and 2=severe erythema. Total score for ulceration can vary from 0-27 and for erythema from 0-18. Mucositis is present at scores ≥ 1.)

Time frame
First week of RT (mucositis score at one time-point)
2

Oral mucositis

Reduced incidence of clinical mucositis assessed using Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (9 areas in the mouth are examined and signs of ulceration are scored; 0=no lesion,1= lesion \<1cm2, 2=lesion 1-3 cm2, 3=lesion \> 3 cm2 as well as erythema, which is scored as follows: 0=no erythema, 1= mild erythema and 2=severe erythema. Total score for ulceration can vary from 0-27 and for erythema from 0-18. Mucositis is present at scores ≥ 1.)

Time frame
Second week of RT (mucositis score at one time-point)
3

Oral mucositis

Reduced incidence of clinical mucositis assessed using Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (9 areas in the mouth are examined and signs of ulceration are scored; 0=no lesion,1= lesion \<1cm2, 2=lesion 1-3 cm2, 3=lesion \> 3 cm2 as well as erythema, which is scored as follows: 0=no erythema, 1= mild erythema and 2=severe erythema. Total score for ulceration can vary from 0-27 and for erythema from 0-18. Mucositis is present at scores ≥ 1.)

Time frame
Third week of RT (mucositis score at one time-point)
4

Oral mucositis

Reduced incidence of clinical mucositis assessed using Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (9 areas in the mouth are examined and signs of ulceration are scored; 0=no lesion,1= lesion \<1cm2, 2=lesion 1-3 cm2, 3=lesion \> 3 cm2 as well as erythema, which is scored as follows: 0=no erythema, 1= mild erythema and 2=severe erythema. Total score for ulceration can vary from 0-27 and for erythema from 0-18. Mucositis is present at scores ≥ 1.)

Time frame
Fourth week of RT (mucositis score at one time-point)

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Göteborg University

Lead sponsor

Ryhov County Hospital

Collaborator

Region Jönköping County

Collaborator

Swedish Cancer Foundation

Collaborator

Kalmar County Hospital

Collaborator

Norrlands University Hospital

Collaborator

The Sjöberg Foundation

Collaborator

TUA research funding: The Sahlgrenska Academy/Region Västra Götaland

Collaborator

Malmö University

Collaborator