Evaluation of Effectiveness of Closed-loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (CL-SCS) Therapy for Treatment of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorRijnstate Hospital

About this trial

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effectiveness of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) therapy for treatment of painful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy.

The closed-loop SCS (CL-SCS) system stimulates the nerves in the spinal cord, measures their responses and automatically adjust the stimulation level accordingly in real time for each delivered pulse.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Subject is deemed a suitable candidate for SCS implantation and has been routinely scheduled to undergo an SCS implantation with the Evoke SCS System.

Subject has a minimum of leg or arm pain intensity of 5/10 on the numeric rating scale (NRS) at baseline due to CIPN.

Patients with CIPN following chemotherapy and at least 6 months post-treatment

CIPN symptoms for a minimum duration of 3 months.

Disqualifiers

Patient refusal to be included in study

Patients unwilling or mentally incapable to complete the study questionnaires

Other causes of neuropathy (for example diabetic- or small fiber neuropathy)

Previous treatment with SCS for CIPN

Trial population

Patients with painful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy resistent to conventional medical management. Patients are eligible for SCS implantation and are scheduled to undergo closed-loop SCS implantation.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

20 Participants
are grouped into 1 trial group
Group A: Patients with painful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Overall pain intensity

The primary effectiveness outcome measure is pain intensity measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 no pain, 10 worst imaginable pain) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.

Time frame
The difference between baseline and the evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.

Secondary outcomes

1

Pain intensity for the extremities (arms and/or legs)

Pain intensity for the arms and/or legs measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 no pain, 10 worst imaginable pain).

Time frame
The difference between baseline and the evaluation at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.
2

9-Item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

Assessment of quality of life in seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) all assessed using the PROMIS-29 questionnaire. PROMIS-29 is scored on a T-score metric with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the U.S. general population, with a higher score representing more symptoms.

Time frame
The difference between baseline and the evaluation 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.
3

CIPN-related symptoms

Assessment of CIPN-related symptoms using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20). EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 contains 20 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale for sensory, motor and autonomic symptoms. Scale scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating increased symptoms.

Time frame
The change between baseline and the evaluation 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCS implantation.
4

Medication use

Assessment of pain medication use

Time frame
The change between baseline and the evaluation 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment with closed-loop SCS

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Rijnstate Hospital

Lead sponsor

Saluda Medical Pty Ltd

Collaborator