Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing and Implant Stability Of Hydrophilic Versus Conventional Titanium Dental Implants.

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorKrishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital

About this trial

Dental implants have become more common treatment for replacing missing teeth and aim to improve chewing efficiency, physical health and esthetic. Researchers always tried to improve design, mechanical and chemical properties of implant. Major benefit of surface modification are to improve hydrophilicity, cell to implant adhesion and cell proliferation. These modification improve osseointegration and reduce treatment duration. In this study investigators are evaluating healing capacity of hydrophilic implant compared to conventional implant.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

At least above 18 years of age.

Patients who needs replacement of two or more teeth in mandible.

Adequate bone volume to accommodate planned dental implants.

Disqualifiers

General contraindication to dental implant treatment. (Uncontrolled diabetes and severe cardiovascular or infectious diseases).

Intravenous and oral bisphosphonate therapy.

Presence of severe, moderate or mild untreated periodontal disease.

Unwillingness to return for the follow-up examination.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Dental Implant Surgery - Hydrophilic group

    Procedure/Surgery

    A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated, under Local anaesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufactures instructions, and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. One site received a hydrophilic implant and the other site received a conventional implant. Ostell ISQ was used to measure primary stability of the dental implant. The surgical wound closure was with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl suture.

  • Dental Implant Surgery - Conventional group

    Procedure/Surgery

    A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated, under Local anaesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufactures instructions, and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. One site received a hydrophilic implant and the other site received a conventional implant. Ostell ISQ was used to measure primary stability of the dental implant. The surgical wound closure was with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl suture.

Treatment groups

10 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Hydrophilic Dental Implant GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Conventional Dental Implant GroupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Implant Stability Using Resonance Frequency Analysis

Implant stability is measured

Time frame
"Baseline", "2 weeks", "1 month", "3 months"
2

Marginal Bone Loss Using RVG and Grid.

Marginal Bone Loss Measured

Time frame
"3 months"
3

Soft tissue healing

Soft tissue healing will be assessed using Landry Turnbull and Howley Healing Index. Where soft tissue healing will be scored from 1 to 5, where score "1" indicate worse score and score "5" indicate Best score

Time frame
"1 Week", "2 weeks", "1 month", "3 months"

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: