About this trial
Patients undergoing breast reduction or mastopexy surgery will be screened and recruited for participation in the study. Eligible patients will act as their own control with one breast receiving the active intervention (ChitoCare® medical Scar Healing Gel) and the other receiving standard of care (Amoena CuraScar Mammilla Circles Silicone Scar Patch and Amoena CuraScar Anchors Silicone Scar Patch). The active and control interventions will be applied for six months, and participants will be followed for up to 12 months. The scar properties of each breast will be assessed at study initiation (Day 0) and at study visits at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and via blinded assessment of photographs. Other subjective parameters such as pain, itching, and overall perception of the healed wound will be collected at each study visit via the POSAS, and patients' opinion, preferences, and compliance regarding the treatments will be collected via a basic questionnaire.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Written informed consent must be given
Female ≥ 18 years old
Having planned or very recently (within 21 days) undergone breast reduction or mastopexy surgery on both breasts
Not yet begun any treatment aimed at reducing scarring
Disqualifiers
Patients with serious concomitant disease (cancer, heart failure (NYHA class IV), severe anaemia (Hb<100 g/L), neoplasia)
Any significant condition that may preclude the participant from the study (e.g. severe depression or psychiatric illness)
Patients who will require additional surgical procedures during the study
Patients diagnosed with autoimmune connective tissue diseases
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
ChitoCare® medical Scar Healing Gel (Örsáragel)
DeviceChitoCare® medical Scar Healing Gel is a topical gel indicated for the treatment of new and old scars. The Scar Healing Gel provides a soothing effect and support to the scar tissue to heal in an orderly manner. It protects against infections, stimulates cell proliferation in old and new scars, as well as correct tissue organization with proper collagen alignment for a better aesthetic appearance and skin flexibility. Ideal for treating scars after accidents, surgery, C-section and cosmetic surgery. For smoother and less visible scars. May be used by the whole population, also elderly and children.
Amoena CuraScar Mammilla Circles Silicone Scar Patch and Amoena CuraScar Anchors Silicone Scar Patch
DeviceAmoena CuraScar Mammilla Circles Silicone Scar Patch and Amoena CuraScar Anchors Silicone Scar Patch are silicon-based, single-patient, multi-use scar patches intended for use as scar reduction therapy in surgical breast scars. The silicone creates a moist environment on the scar, which prevents the scar from drying out. It keeps the scar soft and has a positive effect on scar tissue. The devices are specifically designed for breast scarring and are shaped to fit the normal surgical scars experienced after breast surgery.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Comparison of scar assessment at 12 months
Comparison of the subjective assessment of scar appearance using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale 3.0 (POSAS) in active vs control group at 12-months post-surgery. The POSAS 3.0, for both the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale, rates each individual item on a 5-point scale. The minimum value for an item is 1, which corresponds to a scar characteristic or sensation that is like normal skin (a better outcome). The maximum value for an item is 5, which indicates the largest difference from normal skin or the worst imaginable scar characteristic or sensation (a worse outcome). The total score for the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale is calculated by summing the scores of the individual items within each scale. Consequently, for the POSAS 3.0, a higher total score on either the Patient Scale or the Observer Scale signifies a worse scar outcome or a greater severity of scar-related issues from that perspective.
Secondary outcomes
Comparison of scar assessment at 3, 6, and 9 months
Comparison of the subjective assessment of scar appearance using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in active vs control group at 3, 6, and 9 months post-surgery. The POSAS 3.0, for both the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale, rates each individual item on a 5-point scale. The minimum value for an item is 1, which corresponds to a scar characteristic or sensation that is like normal skin (a better outcome). The maximum value for an item is 5, which indicates the largest difference from normal skin or the worst imaginable scar characteristic or sensation (a worse outcome). The total score for the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale is calculated by summing the scores of the individual items within each scale. Consequently, for the POSAS 3.0, a higher total score on either the Patient Scale or the Observer Scale signifies a worse scar outcome or a greater severity of scar-related issues from that perspective.
Improvement in subjective assessment of scar tissue
Improvement of the subjective assessment of scar tissue between Day 0 and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using the POSAS in active vs control arm. The POSAS 3.0, for both the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale, rates each individual item on a 5-point scale. The minimum value for an item is 1, which corresponds to a scar characteristic or sensation that is like normal skin (a better outcome). The maximum value for an item is 5, which indicates the largest difference from normal skin or the worst imaginable scar characteristic or sensation (a worse outcome). The total score for the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale is calculated by summing the scores of the individual items within each scale. Consequently, for the POSAS 3.0, a higher total score on either the Patient Scale or the Observer Scale signifies a worse scar outcome or a greater severity of scar-related issues from that perspective.
Blinded assessment of scars
Comparison of scar appearance at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months as judged by blinded assessment of photographs of active vs control intervention using the modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (mSBSES). For the modified SBSES, the scoring is structured such that higher scores indicate a better cosmetic outcome or less noticeable scarring. Scar width, height, colour, and presence of incision line are rated on a scale for 0-2, where 0 indicates a worse outcome, and 2 indicates similarity to normal skin. The best possible score is therefore 8, and worst outcome is 0.
Comparison of pain, discomfort, itching, and range of motion
Comparison of pain or discomfort, itching, range of motion etc. between the groups as captured by the POSAS at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The POSAS 3.0, for both the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale, rates each individual item on a 5-point scale. The minimum value for an item is 1, which corresponds to a scar characteristic or sensation that is like normal skin (a better outcome). The maximum value for an item is 5, which indicates the largest difference from normal skin or the worst imaginable scar characteristic or sensation (a worse outcome). The total score for the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale is calculated by summing the scores of the individual items within each scale. Consequently, for the POSAS 3.0, a higher total score on either the Patient Scale or the Observer Scale signifies a worse scar outcome or a greater severity of scar-related issues from that perspective.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: