Exploring Feasibility, Acceptability and Impact of Using Neurofeedback with Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age55+
SponsorQueen's University

About this trial

The goal of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility, acceptability and potential impact of using neurofeedback interventions to manage cognitive, emotional, and behavioural symptoms in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: (1) What is the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of using the Nonlinear Dynamical Neurofeedback intervention for persons living with MCI? (2) What is the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of using the Low Energy Neurofeedback System (LENS) intervention for persons living with MCI? (3) What is the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of using the Brain Music neurofeedback intervention for persons living with MCI? (4) What is the potential impact of five weeks of a neurofeedback intervention on cognitive, affective, and behavioural symptoms experienced by persons living with MCI? Participants will be randomly assigned to either the Nonlinear Dynamical (NLD), Low Energy Neurofeedback System (LENS), or Brain Music neurofeedback intervention groups or a control group receiving usual care.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) attending the Memory Clinic at Providence Care Hospital in Kingston, Ontario

Disqualifiers

Adults with cognitive issues related to a psychiatric diagnosis or acute brain injury

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Nonlinear dynamical neurofeedback (NLD)

    Other intervention

    NeurOptimal nonlinear dynamical (NLD) neurofeedback brain training works as a detection and monitoring system of changes in cortical patterns within the brain, mirroring the brain activity that can be undermining optimal brain function, providing the brain with the information it needs to make its own adjustments which over time results in the brain functioning more efficiently and effectively. Two scalp sensors at C3 \& C4 and two earclips at tops of ears (reference) and one on the earlobe (ground) are used to read EEG activity which is analyzed by the NeurOptimal software. As participants listen to music through earbuds, information is fed back to the individual by slight interruptions in the music. One session lasts 33.5 minutes.

  • Low energy neurofeedback system (LENS)

    Other intervention

    Low energy neurofeedback system (LENS) therapy is an EEG-based direct neurofeedback system that stimulates the brain to reset itself and achieve optimal performance. Therapy consists of delivery of a tiny electromagnetic field carrying the feedback signal down the electrode wires for only one second at each of the chosen electrode sites during every session. Generally, between one and seven of the ordinary electrode sites are utilized during each session. Therapy is adapted to the participant's reactivity/sensitivity and the response of their nervous system.

  • Brain Music

    Other intervention

    Chen Medimo Corp (CMC) Brain Music neurofeedback analyzes an individual's EEG brainwave patterns and translates them into orchestral music. Listening to this personalized brain music allows the individual to gain self-awareness and rewire and alter their own mental states. The Brain Music protocol requires regular in-person follow-ups for optimal results. Generally, the number of sessions varies based on individual needs and the progress made in response to the CMC Brain Music. A minimum of once a week in-person sessions is recommended for qEEG model updating to accurately track progress. Each session may last 30 minutes. Additionally, participants are advised to listen to their personalised music at least once a day, with a minimum of two listens per session. In general, participants may start to detect a change in their neurodevelopmental or cognitive function in 4-6 weeks.

  • Usual Care

    Other intervention

    The Usual Care control group will be followed in the Memory clinic at intervals determined by their clinician. Usual Care for individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at the The Memory Clinic consists of inter-professional assessment, diagnosis and recommendations. There are currently no drugs approved to treat MCI. Therapy is aimed at managing treatable causes and contributors including medication side effects, thyroid problems, sleep apnea, vitabim B deficiency, depression, anxiety, and unrecognized or untreated difficulties with hearing or vision. Neurofeedback is not a component of the standard of care.

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Nonlinear dynamical neurofeedback (NLD)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Low energy neurofeedback system (LENS)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Brain MusicExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group D: Usual CareOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Feasibility Measure 1: Study participation rates

Feasibility of the neurofeedback interventions will be assessed by study participation rates.

Time frame
Data will be collected throughout the study enrolment period of three months
2

Feasibility Measure 2: Survey response rates

Feasibility of the neurofeedback interventions will be assessed by survey response rates.

Time frame
Data will be collected throughout the study enrolment and delivery period of six months.
3

Feasibility Measure 3: Study withdrawal rates

Feasibility of the neurofeedback interventions will be assessed by study withdrawal rates.

Time frame
Data will be collected throughout the study enrolment and delivery period of six months.
4

Creyos Health Cognitive Assessment: Objective measure of cognition

The primary clinical outcome of cognition will be measured objectively using the Creyos Health Cognitive Assessment, an online platform of validated neurocognitive tasks and batteries that have been used in over 300 peer-reviewed studies to measure core elements of cognition. Individual raw scores on a task are compared with a population of individuals of the same gender and age group and presented as standard scores and percentiles and then adjusted to better reflect the individual's true cognitive ability. Scores are classified as average, below average or above average based on the standard score. We will use the 6-task version of the Creyos MCI battery as it appears to be adequate for monitoring and reduces testing time.

Time frame
Measurement will occur at three time points: (T0) at week 0, immediately before the first neurofeedback session, (T1) at week5, after the last neurofeedback session, and (T2) 5 weeks following the last neurofeedback session.

Secondary outcomes

1

Beck Anxiety Inventory: Anxiety

The Beck Anxiety Inventory consists of 21 items to assess a broad range of emotional, physical, cognitive and behavioural symptoms that represent important dimensions of anxiety. The BAI shows high internal consistency (alpha=.92) and test-retest reliability over 1 week, r(81) = .75. Individual scale items are rated on a scale from 0 to 3. The total score is cauculted by finding the sum of the 21 items. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.

Time frame
Measurement will occur at three time points: (T0) at week 0, immediately before the first neurofeedback session, (T1) at week 5, after the last neurofeedback session, and (T2) 5 weeks following the last neurofeedback session.
2

Beck Depression Inventory: Depression

The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) consists of 21 items to assess the intensity of depression in clinical and normal patients over the preceding two weeks. Each item is a list of four statements arranged in increasing severity about a particular symptom of depression in alignment with the DSM-IV criteria. The BDI-II (Coefficient Alpha = .92) showed improved clinical sensitivity over the BDI (Coefficient Alpha = .86). ndividual scale items are rated on a scale from 0 to 3. The total score is cauculted by finding the sum of the 21 items. Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.

Time frame
Measurement will occur at three time points: (T0) at week 0, immediately before the first neurofeedback session, (T1) at week5, after the last neurofeedback session, and (T2) 5 weeks following the last neurofeedback session.
3

Short-Form Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: Sleep quality

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate 7 component scores and a global score. The PSQI demonstrates acceptable measures of internal homogeneity, consistency and validity, and distinguishes well between good and poor sleepers. We will use the short form SF-PSQI in this study, a 13-item scale that corresponds to 5 of the 7 components of the original tool. Total scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores associated with poorer sleep quality.

Time frame
Measurement will occur at three time points: (T0) at week 0, immediately before the first neurofeedback session, (T1) at week5, after the last neurofeedback session, and (T2) 5 weeks following the last neurofeedback session.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Queen's University

Lead sponsor

Providence Health & Services

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: