About this trial
This clinical trial compares patient (proband)-mediated communication to provider-mediated communication for improving genetic testing in first-degree relatives of patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. It is estimated that 30% of cases of colorectal cancer have a genetic basis and about 15% of these patients have a disease-causing (pathogenic) inherited (germline) variant in a cancer susceptibility gene. Most individuals carrying a pathogenic germline variant are unaware of their cancer risk and may not meet guidelines for genetic testing. Identifying pathogenic germline variants or hereditary cancer syndromes in cancer patients has important implications for their at-risk relatives who may not know that they are at high risk for cancer. The burden of communicating this risk to first-degree relatives often falls on the patients, who may lack sufficient knowledge to correctly share and explain their genetic test results. Receiving provider-mediated communication of genetic testing results may be more effective at communicating genetic risk to first-degree relatives than the usual practice of proband-mediated communication.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
STEP 1 PROBANDS: Age >= 18 years
STEP 1 PROBANDS: Patients with a newly diagnosed (within 3 months of registration), primary colorectal adenocarcinoma, stage I to IV
Histologically proven stage I to IV colon or rectal adenocarcinoma (any T or N, M+). Tumors deemed to originate in the colon can extend into/involve the small bowel (e.g., those at the ileocecal valve). Tumors will be regarded as originating in the colon if the entire tumor is in the colon. In the case of rectal involvement, the cancer will be considered a rectal primary
Patients with more than one primary colon adenocarcinoma are eligible
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Biospecimen Collection
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo collection of blood samples
Genetic Testing
Other interventionUndergo genetic testing
Communication Intervention
Other interventionReceive proband-mediated communication
Survey Administration
Other interventionAncillary studies
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Proportion of eligible first-degree relatives (FDRs) of the affected proband who underwent genetic testing
This is a binary outcome. To test for a between-arm difference in the proportion of eligible FDRs receiving genetic testing, the primary analysis will apply a mixed-effects logistic regression model to account for between-family variability or equivalently the within family correlation. The mixed-effects logistic regression model will be applied separately within the subset of families who are associated with a proband who has Lynch syndrome (LS), and within the subset of families who are associated with a proband who harbors non-LS pathogenic germline variants (PGVs).
Secondary outcomes
Proportion of eligible FDRs with a PGV undergoing disease prevention efforts
Binary outcome indicating whether an eligible FDR with a PGV who underwent disease prevention efforts at 12 months between the provider-mediated arm (Arm B) and the proband-mediated cascade testing arm (Arm A).
Other outcomes
Proportion of eligible FDRs of the affected proband who underwent genetic testing
Will repeat LS and non-LS analyses according to pre-defined proband sub-groups (Non-Hispanic White vs. other races/ethnicities; female vs. male; age \>= 50 vs. \< 50; urban vs. rural; academic setting vs. community setting). It is clinically important to quantify the effect of the provider-mediated direct-contact approach within these subgroups and the degree of imprecision as measured by the corresponding confidence interval. Thus, we will report the odds ratio and descriptive 95% confidence interval.
Degree to which the somatic tumor profiling identifies a germline event
Will estimate the proportion of cases where the germline mutation is detected by somatic next generation sequencing testing of the tumor. The corresponding lower bound of the one-sided 90% interval will be calculated for the true but unknown proportion.
Spectrum and prevalence of PGVs in cancer susceptibility genes
For each, descriptive statistics will include the frequency and percentage as well as the standard error.
Disease-free survival (DFS) of probands
: DFS will be compared between direct-contact arm and proband-directed cascade testing arm. DFS percentages, standard errors, and the intervention effect comparison will be obtained from the Kaplan-Meier method, Greenwood's formula, and log-rank tests, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression models will be used to estimate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for the intervention comparison.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Collaborator