FANS vs CVAC for Medium to Large Stones
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorOhio State University
About this trial
Improvements in ureteroscopes have led to improved stone free rates. Two new devices (FANS - Flexible and Navigable Suction) and the CVAC ureteroscope have never been compared head to head. This trial will compare these two new suction ureteroscope technologies against each other
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Clinical diagnosis of Nephrolithiasis
Total linear stone diameter 8-20 mm in size
Disqualifiers
Severe medical comorbidities causing inability to undergo general anesthesia
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
ureteroscopy
Deviceureteroscopy will be performed with flexible and navigable suction sheaths
CVAC
DeviceCVAC suction ureteroscopy will be used
Treatment groups
159 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsGroup A: FANSActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: CVACActive comparator 1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
stone free rate
Journal of Endourology definitions using CT evidence
Time frame
up to six weeksSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: