FANS VS DISS in Treatment of Renal Stone < 2cm

ConditionRenal Calculi

Trial statusNot yet recruiting

Trial phaseNot applicable

Trial typeInterventional

Biological sexAll

Age18-60

SponsorAssiut University

About this trial

To compare between FANS \& DISS in :

* Operative time * Stone free rate * Complications * Amount of fluid irrigation

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

All patients < 18 years old presented with renal stone > 2cm whatever the site of the stone (pelvic or calyceal)

Disqualifiers

Inaccessibility to introduce access sheath or FURS

Previous Inserted JJ stent

Active UTI

Patients refuse to participate in the protocol

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

Flexible ureteroscopy
Procedure/Surgery
Unlike traditional rigid sheaths, FANS features a deflectable tip that can be guided into specific calyces, allowing for synchronized suction and active fragment evacuation. Conversely, Direct In-Scope Suction (DISS) utilizes a sheathless approach, where suction is integrated directly into the ureteroscope. While DISS avoids potential ureteral trauma associated with access sheaths, FANS is often associated with shorter operative times due to its superior irrigation-aspiration efficiency

Treatment groups

100 Participants

are divided into 2 treatment groups

Group A: Flexible and navigable access sheath (FANS)Experimental treatment 1 intervention

Group B: Direct in scope suction (DISS)Experimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

Operative time

The operative time is the duration of surgical procedure

Time frame

<60 minutes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Assiut University

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: