Feasibility and Effects of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Pain Perception in People With Fibromyalgia

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorPulkit Grover

About this trial

The goal of this interventional study is to learn whether noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) will have an effect on pain perception in people with fibromyalgia. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do repeated sessions of NIBS lead to a reduction in perceived pain? Do repeated sessions of NIBS lead to an improvement in quality of life?

Researchers will compare different brain targets to see if effects are different between them.

Participants will receive repeated daily sessions of NIBS over 4 weeks with application of pressure pain algometry, and complete various questionnaires.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Formal diagnosis of fibromyalgia made by a practicing physician

Pain resistant to common analgesics and medications for chronic pain

Existing pain for more than 3 months with an average of at least 4 on a 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Females of child bearing potential must be at least one of the following totally abstinent from heterosexual intercourse since the last menses before start of study, or agree to concurrent use of at least two methods of birth control throughout study participation.

Disqualifiers

If the subject is non-ambulatory.

If the subject is female of child-bearing potential, subject must not be pregnant.

Subject must not have a history of brain surgery or uncontrolled neurological conditions, such as seizure, fainting spells, transient ischemic attack.

Subject must not have lifetime history of severe, uncontrolled mood disorders (anxiety, depression, bipolar), psychotic disorders, other neural disorders, or heart disease.

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Primary Motor Cortex Stimulation

    Device

    Short (\<1 ms), high amplitude (\>10 mA) noninvasive electrical pulses delivered at 1 Hz on the scalp surface. This intervention will target the primary motor cortex (M1).

  • Occipital Lobe Stimulation

    Device

    Short (\<1 ms), high amplitude (\>10 mA) noninvasive electrical pulses delivered at 1 Hz on the scalp surface. This intervention will target the occipital lobe.

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Primary Motor Cortex Stimulation, then Occipital Lobe StimulationExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Occipital Lobe Stimulation, then Primary Motor Cortex StimulationExperimental treatment 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Feasibility of the transcranial electrical stimulation protocol

Feasibility of the protocol will be measured quantitatively using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) score. Score ranges from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher level of feasibility. It will also be assessed qualitatively via participant interviews.

Time frame
From end of the last study session until up to 6 months after.
2

Tolerability of transcranial electrical stimulation protocol

Determined qualitatively from study-related participant attrition rate (%) and adherence to protocol (%).

Time frame
Every day from enrollment until up to 6 months after the last study session.
3

Acceptability of transcranial electrical stimulation protocol

Acceptability of the protocol will be measured quantitatively using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) score. Score ranges from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher level of acceptability. It will also be assessed qualitatively via participant interviews.

Time frame
From end of the last study session until up to 6 months after.
4

Pressure pain threshold (PPT)

PPT (in lbf) will be measured using a digital algometer, which will be used to press down on the participants' thumb nails and legs to assess pain sensitization throughout the study.

Time frame
At every study session from Session 1 until the last study session.

Secondary outcomes

1

Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR)

FIQR will be used to assess the participant's experience with fibromyalgia (symptoms and impact on daily life). Score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater severity of fibromyalgia symptoms and functional impairment.

Time frame
Weekly from enrollment until up to 6 months after the last study session.
2

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

BPI will be used to assess the participant's pain severity and interference. Score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse (more severe) pain or interference.

Time frame
Daily, from enrollment until up to 6 months after the last study session.
3

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29)

We will use the standardized survey score PROMIS-29 to assess physical and mental health in seven domains (e.g., physical function, anxiety, sleep disturbance etc.). Each question score ranges from one to five, corresponding to the intensity within the question's domain. Survey scores will be converted to a t-score metric and assessed.

Time frame
Weekly, from enrollment until up to 6 months after the last study session.

Other outcomes

1

Number of steps

Assess change in number of steps taken daily using a wearable device.

Time frame
Every day from enrollment until up to 4 weeks after the last study session.
2

Active zone minutes

Assess change in number of minutes spent in active heart rate zone using a wearable device.

Time frame
Every day from enrollment until up to 4 weeks after the last study session.
3

Sleep score

Assess change in sleep quality using a wearable device.

Time frame
Every day from enrollment until up to 4 weeks after the last study session.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Pulkit Grover

Lead sponsor

Carnegie Mellon University

Sponsor institution

Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh

Collaborator

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI)

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: