Feasibility and Outcomes Registry of Lumenless dEfibrillation Leads for Conduction System Pacing

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Caen

About this trial

The recent development and market introduction of small diameter implantable defibrillation leads able to deliver left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has opened the possibility of achieving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using a single- or dual-chamber implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). This approach may reduce the number of intracardiac leads required and, consequently, has the potential to lower both procedural and long-term complication rates. However, the integration of these leads into currently recommended CRT strategies remains hypothetical. The FORGE CSP registry will prospectively enroll patients with an indication for CRT in whom implantation of a LBBAP ICD lead is attempted.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

age > 18-year-old

indication for CRT according to current ESC/EHRA guidelines

first-line LBBAP ICD lead implantation attempted

national insurance coverage

Disqualifiers

pregnancy

Trial population

Consecutive patients with a validated CRT indication for whom the implantation of a LBBAP ICD lead in attempted as a first-line strategy.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

No trial groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

LBBAP ICD lead CRT efficacy

Proportion of patients with an effective CRT (defined by LBBAP validated ECG criteria) using solely the LBBAP ICD lead (plus right atrial lead if appropriate).

Time frame
0 - 3 Months

Secondary outcomes

1

LBBAP ICD lead implantation feasibility

Incidence of successful LBBAP ICD lead implantation (defined by LBBAP ECG validated criteria)

Time frame
Procedural
2

LOT-CRT utilization

Incidence of coronary sinus left ventricular lead implantation (in addition to LBBAP ICD lead)

Time frame
Procedural
3

Safety of LBBAP ICD lead

Incidence of ICD lead micro or macro-dislodgment Incidence of de novo tricuspid regurgitation (grade \> or = 3) Incidence of loss of CRT (based on LBBAP validated ECG criteria)

Time frame
0 - 3 Months
4

Cost-effectiveness

Comparaison of device-associated costs in LBBAP ICD lead recipients and conventional CRT recipients.

Time frame
Procedural

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: