Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety of the Autologous GrOwnValve Transcatheter Pulmonary Heart Valve

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorCharite University, Berlin, Germany

About this trial

Aim of this study is to investigate the clinical safety of a novel pediatric heart valve.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Sufficient appropriate tissue (preferably: Pericardium for pericardiectomy via thoracoscopy or thoracotomy, or sternotomy; other options are fascia lata, rectus fascia, peritoneum or diaphragm)

For patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification II, III, or IV: Moderate (3+) or severe (4+) pulmonary regurgitation AND/OR mean systolic gradient across PV or RVOT ≥ 35 mmHg

For patients in NYHA Classification I: Severe (4+) pulmonary regurgitation with RV dilatation or dysfunction and/or mean PV or RVOT systolic gradient ≥ 40 mmHg

Disqualifiers

Active endocarditis or myocarditis or within 3 months before the screening date

Patients unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent or comply with follow-up requirements

Obstruction of the central veins (including the superior and inferior vena cava, and bilateral iliac veins) such that the Ensemble-delivery system/ Performer™ - Guiding Sheath/ Extra Large Check-Flo® or GORE® DrySeal Flex + Ballon-in-Ballon-catheter cannot be advanced to the heart via a transvenous approach from either femoral vein or internal jugular

Requires emergency surgery

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • GrOwnValve - novel heart valve replacement approach

    Device

    The autologous GrOwnValve is implanted into a stent before it is implanted via minimal-invasive transcatheter technique into the patients with high-grade pulmonary valve insufficiency and right ventricular dilatation. Control intervention/Reference test: Since the study is designed for investigating the safety of the procedure, there will not be a control group. However, the outcomes will be compared as a non-inferiority analysis with the standard of current medical care (Edwards SAPIEN 3 or Medtronic's Melody, both bioprosthetic transcatheter pulmonary valves).

Treatment groups

7 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Implantation of autologous GrOwnValveExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Death

(valve-related, sudden, cardiac, and all-cause death)

Time frame
Up to 5 Years Follow-Up
2

Major bleeding

Assessment if device-related major bleeding has occured by laboratory + echo + CT

Time frame
Up to 1 Year Follow-Up
3

Reoperation

Questioning if device-related re-operation occured

Time frame
Up to 5 Years Follow-Up
4

Acute device-related complications

Measurement tool: Spiroergometry o Parameters: cardiac rhythm, load duration, reason for termination, Heart rate at rest, blood pressure, maximum load level, VE/VCO2, PetCO2, VE/VCO2 slope, VO2, Respiratory rate, VD/VT, SpO2, RER, Borg score, FEV1, FVC

Time frame
Up to 5 Years Follow-Up

Secondary outcomes

1

Availability of pericardium or other tissue for preparation of autologous pulmonary valve graft

Visual assessment of pericardium

Time frame
Procedure (intra-operatively)
2

Post-procedure length of stay

Post-procedure hospital stay in days.

Time frame
Up to day of discharge ( ≤ 30 days)
3

Ventilation time

Timepoints: Procedure Assessment: How long was the ventilation time for each patient within the allocation?

Time frame
Procedure (intra-operatively)
4

Freedom from conduction disturbances and arrhythmias need for permanent pacemaker implantation

Timepoints: Procedure + Discharge + Visit 1 Assessment: Is the implantation of a permanent pacemaker necessary due to disturbances or arrhythmias?

Time frame
Up to 3 months Follow-Up

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.