Fermented Food-Supplemented Diet in Ulcerative Colitis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorStanford University

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to see how a diet that supplements fermented foods effects inflammation and quality of life in patients with mild to moderate Ulcerative Colitis (UC). There is a paucity of research and an enormous need for better understanding of diet and intestinal inflammation. Fermented food have been shown to positively influence inflammatory cytokines and intestinal microbial diversity in healthy volunteers.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Written informed consent

Male or female subjects, ≥18 years of age

Confirmed diagnosis of UC

Symptomatic disease defined as partial Mayo Score 2 to 7 (inclusive)

Disqualifiers

Women who are pregnant, nursing or expect to be pregnant

Intolerance to fermented food

Individuals with a body mass index (BMI) lower than 18

Individuals diagnosed with a serious medical condition (unless approved in writing by a physician)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Fermented Food-supplemented Diet

    Other intervention

    Fermented foods include Kimchi, Sauerkraut, Yoghurt, Kefir and more.

  • Regular Diet

    Other intervention

    No change in diet.

Treatment groups

21 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Fermented Food-Supplemented DietExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Regular Diet Control ArmPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in the clinical disease activity inflammatory marker fecal calprotectin

Change in fecal calprotectin

Time frame
Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).

Secondary outcomes

1

Clinical response as per partial Mayo score.

Clinical response as per partial Mayo score is defined as a decrease from baseline in the partial Mayo Score of \>=2 points and either a rectal bleeding subscore of \<=1 or a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of \>=1 point (assessed at Data Collection 2). The partial Mayo score consists of the subscores for stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and PGA, omitting endoscopy. Each subscore is graded from 0 to 3 (3 being the worst situation and 0 the best) and the partial Mayo score is graded from 0 to 9 (0 being the best, 9 being the worst outcome).

Time frame
Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
2

Clinical remission as per partial Mayo score.

Clinical remission as per partial Mayo score is defined as a partial Mayo score \< 2 points and no individual subscale score \>1 point (assessed at Data Collection 2). The partial Mayo score is graded from 0 to 9 (0 being the best, 9 being the worst outcome).

Time frame
Assessed at Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
3

Symptomatic remission as per Patient Reported Outcome (PRO2) score

Symptomatic remission is defined as as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (assessed at Data Collection 2). The partial Mayo score is graded from 0 to 9 (0 being the best, 9 being the worst outcome).

Time frame
Assessed at Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
4

Patient global assessment

"Do you believe you are in remission from your UC symptoms?" (Yes/No)

Time frame
Assessed at Week 10 (Data Collection 2).

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.