Fighting Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: TMS vs. tDCS Efficacy.

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversitat Oberta de Catalunya

About this trial

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease impacting 2.8 million individuals globally, with fatigue being its most debilitating symptom, reported by 75% of patients. Despite its prevalence, the pathophysiology of MS-related fatigue remains poorly understood, and current pharmacological treatments have limited effectiveness. This research addresses this critical gap by investigating two non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniquestranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)as innovative, effective and scalable therapeutic approaches for MS fatigue.

The study employs a parallel, randomized, triple-blind, multicentric, sham-controlled design to assess and compare the short- and long-term efficacy of TMS and tDCS in addressing MS-related fatigue. 80 participants will be recruited from multiple centers in Spain and randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups: TMS, tDCS, Sham-TMS, Sham-tDCS. Each intervention will consist of 20 sessions, conducted daily from Monday to Friday, over 4 weeks. The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC, F3 following the 10/20 system for EEG) was selected as the stimulation site based on its involvement in MS-related self-reported fatigue and in cognitive fatigability. For TMS experimental groups, intermittent theta-burst protocol (iTBS) will be used to increase the cortical excitability of the stimulated area. iTBS delivers a total of 600 pulses, organised into 50 Hz triplets repeated at 5 Hz, with 2second blocks of pulses, interleaved with 8 seconds of rest, repeated 20 times (total duration: 190s). The intensity of stimulation will be individually tailored based on the active motor threshold (aMT), setting it at 80% of the aMT. The sham stimulation will follow the same protocol, but using a sham coil (placebo). For tDCS experimental groups anodal tDCS will be applied (increasing cortical excitability) with the anode over the left DLPFC (F3), and the cathode over the contralateral supraorbital area. The intensity will be 2mA, and the duration of the stimulation will be 20min per session. For tDCS placebo condition, the sham option available on the device will be selected.

Primary outcomes include changes in fatigue levels measured through MS validated self-report scales (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale-MFIS; Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions-FSMC); secondary outcomes include depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II, BDI-II), quality of life (Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life, MSQOL-54), functional independence (Functional Independence Measure, FIM), and cognitive fatigability (Symbol Digit Modalities Test, SDMT). All the outcomes will be assessed at baseline, at the end of the intervention, and six months after the end of the treatment (6 months follow-up).

This project promotes personalized precision medicine and innovative new treatment methods. This research is expected to expand scientific knowledge on NIBS efficacy in MS, establish evidence-based clinical practices, and set the foundation for cost-effective, patient-centered therapies. The study also addresses gender-specific responses to treatment, ensuring inclusive therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, it has the potential to benefit other neurological conditions characterized by fatigue, such as stroke, chronic fatigue syndrome or Parkinsons disease, showing significant social, clinical, and economic impact.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

MS diagnosis (relapsing-remitting form) according to 2024 McDonald criteria.

≥ 18 years old

Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 1.5-4.5

Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) >4 (mean score of all items)

Disqualifiers

Any other neurological condition beyond MS

Another medical situation potentially associated with fatigue (e.g. sleep apnea, chronic fatigue syndrome, arterial hypertension)

Secondary epilepsy

Matching the exclusion criteria for TMS or tES application (history of epilepsy, metallic inserts in the head with the exception of titanium, pacemaker, electronic prosthesis or biostimulators, electrodes in the brain or spinal cord, dermatological problems) according to international safety guidelines (Antal et al., 2017; Lefaucheur et al., 2014; 2020; Rossi et al., 2021)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • TMS

    Device

    Intermitent theta burst stimulation over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

  • tDCS

    Device

    Transcranial direct current stimulation over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

  • Sham TMS

    Device

    Sham intermitent theta burst stimulation over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

  • Sham tDCS

    Device

    Sham transcranial direct current stimulation over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

Treatment groups

80 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Active TMSExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Sham TMSSham comparator 1 intervention
Group C: Active tDCSExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group D: Sham tDCSSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)

The MFIS is a 21-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess how fatigue impacts the daily lives of people living with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). It consists of 21 items divided into three subscales: Physical subscale (9 items)Cognitive subscale (10 items)Psychosocial subscale (2 items). Items are rated based on the patient's experiences over the past 4 weeks using a 5-point Likert scale (from 0 = "Never" to 4 = "Almost always"). Total score ranges from 0 to 84, with higher score indicating more severe fatigue.

Time frame
Baseline, post-treatment (1 month), and 6 months follow-up
2

Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC)

It is a 20-item scale assessing two dimensions of MS-related fatigue: cognitive and motor. Patients rank statements on a scale from "Does not apply" to "Applies completely". Cut-off values were used to classify patients as experiencing mild, moderate or severe fatigue. Higher scores indicating a greater impact of fatigue.

Time frame
Baseline, post-treatment (1 month), and 6 months follow-up
3

Multiple sclerosis fatigue severity scale (MSFSS)

It is a 9-item (7-point Likert scale), self-report, questionnaire designed to measure the severity of fatigue and its impact on daily activities. It is one of the most widely used and validated scales for patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Higher score Indicates more severe fatigue and interference with the patient's daily responsibilities, work, or social life.

Time frame
Baseline, post-treatment (1 month), and 6 months follow-up
4

Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

The SDMT measures information processing speed, visual scanning, working memory, and sustained attention. It is widely considered the gold standard for detecting and tracking cognitive impairment in patients with Multiple Sclerosis. The total score ranges from 0 to 110, with higher score indicating better cognitive performance.

Time frame
Baseline, post-treatment (1 month), and 6 months follow-up

Secondary outcomes

1

Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL-54)

It is a highly comprehensive, disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument designed for patients with Multiple Sclerosis. It consists of 54 items divided into 12 distinct subscales alongside 2 single items.The 12 Subscales: Physical function, role limitations (physical), role limitations (emotional), pain, emotional well-being, energy/fatigue, health perceptions, social function, cognitive function, health distress, sexual function, and satisfaction with sexual function. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

Time frame
Baseline, post-treatment (1 month), and 6 months follow-up
2

Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

It is an 18-item clinician-administered assessment designed to measure a patient's level of disability and track their functional changes during rehabilitation. It quantifies how much assistance a person requires to perform essential activities of daily living safely. It is divided into two main subscales: Motor Subscale (13 items): Covers self-care, sphincter control, transfers, and locomotion; and Cognitive Subscale (5 items): Covers communication and social cognition (problem-solving, memory). Total score ranges from 18 to 126. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence.

Time frame
Baseline, post-treatment (1 month), and 6 months follow-up
3

Barther Index

The Barthel Index is an internationally recognized, clinician-administered or self-report rating scale used to measure a patient's performance in activities of daily living. It consists of 10 items evaluating basic self-care and mobility tasks. The 10 Items: Feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, toilet use, transfers (bed to chair), mobility (on level surfaces), and stairs. Total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater independence.

Time frame
Baseline, post-treatment (1 month), and 6 months follow-up
4

Selective reminding test (SRT)

The SRT is a highly sensitive neuropsychological verbal memory test designed to assess verbal learning and long-term memory. It is uniquely structured to differentiate between a patient's ability to store information over the long term versus their ability to retrieve it at any given moment. It is widely used to detect cognitive impairment in Multiple Sclerosis. It consists of 6 consecutive learning trials, followed by a delayed recall trial (administered 15 to 30 minutes later) and a final recognition trial. Instead of a single final number, the SRT generates multiple crucial metrics: Long-Term Storage (LTS): The number of words that have entered long-term memory.Consistent Long-Term Retrieval (CLTR): The words consistently recalled across consecutive trials without being reminded.Short-Term Storage (STS): Words recalled only after just being read. Higher scores in all indices indicate better verbal memory and learning capacity.

Time frame
Baseline, post-treatment (1 month), and 6 months follow-up

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: