Flapless Immediate Implant Placement With Socket Shield Technique Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Anterior Maxilla

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age21-50
SponsorInternational Dental Contiuing Education

About this trial

The present study aims to compare the dimensional stability of the supra-implant complex following flapless immediate implant placement using two socket management approaches: the connective tissue graft and the socket shield technique. Three-dimensional volumetric analysis and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be employed to assess and quantify changes in soft and hard tissue thickness and height surrounding the implant site.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Initial intact thick gingival biotype

2 mm band of keratinized tissue,

Thin intact labial bone plate (< 1mm)

Good apical bone for primary stability

Disqualifiers

Immediate implants with bone grafts or guided bone regeneration procedures

Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus

Patients taking IV bisphosphonates for treatment of osteoporosis

Patients with active infection related at the site of implant

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • IIP+Socket Shield

    Procedure/Surgery

    The socket shield technique, which preserves a labial root fragment to maintain periodontal ligament support.

  • IIP+CTG

    Procedure/Surgery

    connective tissue grafting which increases soft-tissue volume

Treatment groups

28 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: IIP+ Socket sheildExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: IIP+CTGActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Soft tissue Volume gain/loss

The volumetric analysis in this clinical trial will be performed to obtain profilometric measurements. intraoral scans will be taken at baseline, 6- and 12-month post-operative for each patient. The best-fit algorithm will be used to superimpose digital surface models, when comparing each area of interest (AOI) throughout out the follow up period. Unchanged neighboring teeth surfaces will be used as a reference for proper superimposition. In each patient, the AOI will be kept constant for all pairwise comparisons. The volumetric analysis software will calculate the overall buccal soft tissue volume loss/gain (mm3) within the AOI for each patient.

Time frame
one year

Secondary outcomes

1

Mid-facial gingival margin level

linear change of the Mid-facial gingival margin pre- and after one year

Time frame
12 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: