Flexible Tip Bougie vs Tube With Stylet for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-90
SponsorHospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago

About this trial

Although VLs improve glottic visualization, on many occasions it may not be accompanied by intubation at the first attempt, because the endotracheal tube has to pass a sharp angle to enter the trachea. To avoid this limitation, a new flexible tip bougie is designed to flexibly navigate the distal tip and help facilitate precise insertion of the endotracheal tube in the trachea. The flexible tip bougie has an integrated slider along the surface which moves the tip anterior and posterior while the pre-curved distal portion of shaft allows the angulation to provide anterior flexion. This new flexible tip bougie could be used as a rescue when first intubation failure using the videolaryngoscopy, or as a first option to improve the percentage of patients intubated at the first attempt.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

18 years and older

Patients with anticipated difficult airway requiring intubation under with a videolaryngoscopy

Written informed consent from the patient or proxy (if present) before inclusion or once possible when patient has been included in a context of emergency.

Disqualifiers

Pregnancy

age <18 years

refusal of the patient

patient's respiratory failure

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Endotracheal Tube with Stylet

    Device

    Patients randomised to Endotracheal Tube with Stylet will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with an endotracheal tube + stylet.

  • Flexible Tip Bougie

    Device

    Patients randomised to Flexible Tip Bougie will be intubated with a Videolaryngoscopy and with a Flexible Tip Bougie.

Treatment groups

140 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Endotracheal Tube with StyletActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Flexible Tip BougieActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Difference in the first attempt intubation success rate (percentage)

To compare the difference in the first attempt intubation success rate (percentage) with the two differents devices compared.

Time frame
During intubation

Secondary outcomes

1

Difference in the overall intubation success rate (percentage)

To compare the difference overall intubation success rate (percentage) with the two differents devices compared.

Time frame
During intubation
2

Difference in the incidence of complications (percentage)

To compare the difference in complications (percentage) with the two different devices compared: Hypoxemia (SpO2) \< 90 %, Hypoxemia severe (SpO2) \< 80 %, Hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg, Severe hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 65 mm Hg, Cardiac arrest, death during intubation, Moderate or difficult intubation, oesophageal intubation, pulmonary aspiration, dental injuries.

Time frame
Participants will be followed from the beginning of the intervention to 30 minutes after the intervention
3

Difficulty of intubation

Operator-assessed subjective difficulty of intubation by means of a special analogue numerical scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no subjective difficulty and 10=maximal subjective difficulty

Time frame
During intubation
4

Modified Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view

Modified Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view: I: full view of the glottis IIa: partial view of the glottis IIb: arytenoid or posterior part of the vocal cords just visible III: only epiglottis visible IV: neither glottis nor epiglottis visible

Time frame
During intubation

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.