Forceps vs. Snare IVC Filter Removal

ConditionDVT
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Chicago

About this trial

IVC filters are mechanical filters placed in a patient's body to trap blood clots in the legs migrating to the lungs. When no longer indicated, interventional radiologists are consulted for IVC filter removal. Currently, many methods for extracting IVC filters exist. Two of the most common methods involve using an endovascular snare device or rigid forceps. We intend to prospectively compare these two methods in an attempt to see if one offers an advantage to the other. This will be compared by evaluating success rates and procedure time.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Non-pregnant females

Adult patients (age 18 years and older)

Referred to Interventional Radiology for IVC filter removal

IVC filter implanted less than 6 months with the procedure being performed at UCMC by current IR staff.

Disqualifiers

Patients with outside hospital filter placement

Filters other than Cook Celect or Argon Medical Option Elite

Implantation period >6 months

Evidence of coagulopathy (INR <1.8, platelet count >50k)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • IVC filter removal

    Device

    In the clinic, it will be explained to patient that they are asked to participate in a study that would randomize them to one of two established techniques for IVC filter removal. It will be explained these are both techniques that are used by interventional radiologists normally used for IVC filter retrieval. One technique would be the utilization of an endovascular snare (like a lasso) device that is designed to catch the hook of the filter and allow it to be captured. The other technique described will be the usage of a rigid forceps device that will be used to engage the filter apex directly and allow for the filter to be capture/removed.

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ForcepsActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: SnareActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Removal success rate

Data will be analyzed by a biostatistician to determine statistical differences between cohorts with respect to outcome measures.

Time frame
Procedure date
2

Flouroscopy time

Venography will be performed using a flush catheter and contrast material to evaluate for tip embedding. After filter retrieval, repeat venography will be performed to evaluate for thrombosis, caval spasm, caval perforation, fractured fragments, and other potential complications.

Time frame
Procedure start to finish
3

Costs

Costs associated with filter removal encounter

Time frame
Date of procedure up through 6 months following IVC filter removal
4

Procedure related complications

After hemostasis is achieved, patients will be monitored for 2-4 hours in the interventional radiology recovery area. One month after filter retrieval, patients will be seen in clinic for follow-up. During this visit, a physicial assessment will done, including adverse events and review of medications. Six months after filter retrieval, patient will be contacted by telephone for follow-up. Adverse event and medication review will be performed during this call.

Time frame
Date of procedure through 6 months following IVC filter removal

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.