About this trial
The treatment of periodontitis requires the removal of dental biofilm through both professional mechanical plaque removal and at-home oral hygiene practices. This study aims to compare clinical and psychological outcomes following professional treatment using either piezoelectric or magnetostrictive ultrasonic devices.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
>18 years
periodontitis of stage 1 and 2
absence of systemic chronic disease
Disqualifiers
anticoagulants treatment
antibiotic treatment 3 months before the screening visit
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement with piezoelectric device (EMS, mini piezon)
Devicethe use of ultrasonic oscillating tips allows supragingival and subgingival biofilm and dental calculus removal
Full-mouth ultrasonic debridement with magnetostrictive device (Cavitron Select, Dentsply)
Devicethe use of ultrasonic oscillating tips allows supragingival and subgingival biofilm and dental calculus removal
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Pain perception
vas scale (0-10) for perception of pain after treatment
noise
vas scale (0-10) for perception of noise after treatment
vibration
vas scale (0-10) for perception of vibration after treatment
Secondary outcomes
pocket closure
change of pocket probing depth (millimeter) after treatment measured with a periodontal probe
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.