Funcional Recovery After Minithoracotomy or Sternotomy for CABG in Frail Patients

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age60+
SponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo General Hospital

About this trial

Frailty is a major predictor of adverse outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), being associated with increased postoperative complications, prolonged hospitalization, delayed functional recovery, and reduced quality of life. Although minimally invasive coronary surgery (MICS) through left minithoracotomy has been associated with reduced surgical trauma and faster recovery in selected patients, its benefits have not been evaluated in a randomized trial specifically involving frail patients.

The MINI FRAGILE trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial designed to compare minimally invasive CABG performed through left anterior minithoracotomy with conventional median sternotomy in patients aged 60 years or older with pre-frailty or frailty undergoing surgical coronary revascularization. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either surgical approach.

The primary objective is to determine whether minimally invasive CABG improves functional recovery, assessed by the change in the physical component of the SF-36 Health Survey 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include major adverse cardiovascular events, mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, return to usual activities, surgical site infection, perioperative complications, postoperative pain, readmission, and adherence to enhanced recovery measures. The results of this trial are expected to provide high-quality evidence regarding the optimal surgical approach for frail patients requiring coronary artery bypass grafting.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 60 years or older.

Diagnosis of coronary artery disease with an established indication for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Coronary anatomy considered suitable for complete surgical revascularization through a left anterolateral minithoracotomy, including suitable distal coronary targets with a luminal diameter of at least 1.5 mm.;

Unintentional weight loss of at least 4.5 kg or at least 5% of body weight during the previous year.

Disqualifiers

Requirement for emergency cardiac surgery.

Planned concomitant cardiac surgical procedure in addition to coronary artery bypass grafting.

Clinically significant peripheral vascular disease involving the femoral vessels that prevents safe peripheral cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass, when peripheral cannulation may be required.

Contraindication to left minithoracotomy, including pleural adhesions, pleural thickening, or other thoracic conditions that prevent safe access to the mediastinum through the intercostal space.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MICS-CABG)

    Procedure/Surgery

    Participants undergo coronary artery bypass grafting through a left anterior minithoracotomy with or without cardiopulmonary bypass, according to the surgical plan. Standardized perioperative enhanced recovery measures are applied.

  • Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (Median Sternotomy)

    Procedure/Surgery

    Participants undergo conventional coronary artery bypass grafting through median sternotomy with or without cardiopulmonary bypass according to institutional practice. Postoperative care follows standard institutional protocols.

Treatment groups

194 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MICS)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score at 30 Days

The Short Form-36 Health Survey, version 2 (SF-36v2), will be administered before surgery and 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome is the change in the Physical Component Summary score, calculated as the 30-day score minus the baseline score. SF-36 scores are transformed to a 0-to-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better self-reported physical health and functioning.

Time frame
30 days

Secondary outcomes

1

Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events

Percentage of participants experiencing at least one component of the composite outcome of perioperative myocardial infarction, angina, repeat coronary revascularization, or stroke. Each participant will be counted once in the composite, regardless of the number of events experienced. Perioperative myocardial infarction will be defined according to the prespecified study criteria using postoperative high-sensitivity troponin levels and evidence of new myocardial ischemia. Stroke will be defined as a focal neurological deficit without complete spontaneous resolution within 24 hours.

Time frame
Up to 30 days after surgery
2

All-Cause Mortality

Percentage of participants who die from any cause within 30 days after the index surgical procedure.

Time frame
Up to 30 days after surgery
3

Perioperative Myocardial Infarction

Percentage of participants experiencing perioperative myocardial infarction, defined as a postoperative high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentration greater than 500 times the assay upper reference limit, or greater than 35 times the upper reference limit accompanied by evidence of new myocardial ischemia. Evidence of ischemia may include new ischemic electrocardiographic changes, documented coronary artery or graft occlusion, new loss of viable myocardium, or a new regional ventricular wall-motion abnormality.

Time frame
Up to 30 days after surgery
4

Stroke

Percentage of participants experiencing a new focal neurological deficit without complete spontaneous resolution within 24 hours after onset

Time frame
Up to 30 days after surgery

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Lead sponsor

Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia de Laranjeiras

Collaborator

Hospital e Maternidade Angelina Caron - SC

Collaborator

Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Maceió

Collaborator

Sancta Maggiore Itaim Hospital

Collaborator

Hospital Sao Vicente de Paulo e Hospital de Cidade, Passo Fundo, Brasil

Collaborator

Hospital Clínica Kennedy

Collaborator

Hospital Alberto Urquiza Wanderley

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: