Geriatric-guided Care Versus Conventional Care in Elderly Unfit/Frail Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in First Line Treatment

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age70+
SponsorFondazione Italiana Linfomi - ETS

About this trial

The aim of this multicenter, non-randomized, cluster controlled trial study is to evaluate the impact of a geriatric-guided approach with a pro-active rehabilitative/nutritional plan for elderly unfit/frail DLBCL patients eligible for receiving chemoimmunotherapy according to the sGA, versus a conventional approach with onco-hematological treatment alone.

A key innovation element of this project is to use a geriatric-guided approach to improve the global management of all frailty aspects (nutritional, functional, cognitive, social), chasing a better tolerance and completion rate of treatment, tailoring safety and efficacy of therapies in unfit/frail DLBCL patients.

This study may lead to a personalized approach for elderly DLBCL patients, taking into account a multidisciplinary and fully-integrated program, with the primary aim of improving the quality of life of patients and their families.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Diagnosis of DLBCL or Follicular Lymphoma (FL) grade IIIB.

Age ≥ 70 years.

UNFIT or FRAIL status according to sGA evaluated by the onco-hematologist at baseline.

Patients eligible to a curative intent standard first line chemoimmunotherapy.

Disqualifiers

Patients not meeting at least one of the inclusion criteria listed above.

Refuse to sign a written informed consent.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Geriatric-guided supportive care

    Other intervention

    Structured geriatric consultation, along with a nutritional and physiotherapy evaluation, before treatment initiation and with subsequent follow-up assessments aimed at optimizing comorbidity management, nutritional and functional status, along with treatment tolerance.

  • Conventional supportive care

    Other intervention

    Supportive care will be delivered according to local clinical practice

Treatment groups

170 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Geriatric-guided supportive careExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Conventional supportive careActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

To evaluate whether a geriatric-guided approach improves health-related quality of life (HRQL) in elderly patients with DLBCL eligible for first-line chemoimmunotherapy, compared to a conventional approach.

Change in the Global Health Status/QoL score of the EORTC Quality of Life Core 30 From baseline to end of treatment (6 months after enrollment). EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: ranking from 1 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much").

Time frame
From the beginning of the study up to 6 months after last enrolled patient (up 30 months from study beginning)

Secondary outcomes

1

To assess changes in the functioning scales and symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 performed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months in both study groups (geriatric-guided vs conventional approach)

Change from baseline in the functioning scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social) and symptom scales (e.g., fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at 3, 6, and 12 months. EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: ranking from 1 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much").

Time frame
From the beginning up to the end of study (up to 36 months)
2

To assess changes in simplified Geriatric Assessment (sGA) performed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months in both study groups (geriatric-guided vs conventional approach)

Change in simplified Geriatric Assessment (sGA) classes assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. sGA scale: fit, unfit, frail

Time frame
From the beginning up to the end of study (up to 36 months)
3

To compare eventual dose reductions of therapeutic treatments between groups.

Chemoimmunotherapy dose reductions rate stratified according to therapeutic choices and delivered dose intensity

Time frame
From the beginning of the study up to 6 months after last enrolled patient (up 30 months from study beginning)
4

To evaluate the prognostic impact of sGA on overall survival (OS)

Overall survival evaluation stratified according to sGA

Time frame
From the beginning up to the end of study (up to 36 months)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: