About this trial
A prospective, retrospective, non-randomized, multicenter study with two independent hernia study cohorts (Ventral / Incisional Hernia Repair and Diaphragmatic / Hiatal Hernia Repair). The primary objective of this study is to collect GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial product commercial-use data on device functional performance and short-term patient experience.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
At least 18 years old at the time of informed consent. Minimum age required by state regulations (as applicable).
An expected scored Class I (Clean) surgical wound using CDC Surgical Wound Classification system.
A planned implant with GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial for a single site ventral or hiatal hernia repair as suture line reinforcement.
An expected scored Grade 1 or Grade 2 using the Ventral Hernia Working Group Grading system.
Disqualifiers
Treated in another drug or medical device study within 1 year of study enrollment.
Implanted with GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial in the reconstruction of cardiovascular defects.
Hernia repair expected to be performed as part of a bridged procedure (i.e., expected inability to perform primary closure of fascia or crura, patients requiring permanent support from the device).
A BMI >40.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Gore ENFORM Biomaterial (Preperitoneal)
DeviceENFORM Biomaterial bioabsorbable hernia mesh
Gore ENFORM Biomaterial (Intraperitoneal)
DeviceENFORM Biomaterial bioabsorbable hernia mesh
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Hernia Recurrence - Primary Device Endpoint
Clinical diagnosed hernia recurrence in the area of the initial hernia repair (within device overlap at time of index procedure).
Incidence of SSI - Primary Procedural Endpoint 1
Incidence of SSI, reported as a composite and individually.
Incidence of SSO - Primary Procedural Endpoint 2
Incidence of SSO, reported as a composite and individually.
Incidence of SSOPI - Primary Procedural Endpoint 3
Incidence of SSOPI, reported as a composite and individually.
Secondary outcomes
Freedom from potential device-related SAEs - Secondary endpoint 1
Freedom from potential device-related Serious Adverse Events will be reported descriptively with no formal goals or hypothesis.
Re-intervention at study-treated location - Secondary Endpoint 2
Surgical re-intervention in the area of the hernia repaired initially (e.g. drain insertion, infection, surface issues, second operation, etc.) will be reported descriptively with no formal goals or hypothesis.
Change in Quality of Life in Carolinas Comfort Scale - Secondary Endpoint 3
For ventral hernia subjects; change in Quality of Life in Carolinas Comfort Scale as measured by a change in total score of the Carolinas Comfort Scale Quality of Life questionnaire given at follow-up visits. Minimum Total Score is 0 and maximum Total Score is 115. Lower score means better outcome.
Relief from GERD Symptoms - Secondary Endpoint 4
For diaphragmatic hernia subjects; relief from GERD symptoms as measured by a decrease in the total score of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire given at follow-up visits. Total Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to questions 1-15. Greatest possible score (worst symptoms) = 75 Lowest possible score (no symptoms) = 0 Heartburn Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to questions 1-6. Worst heartburn symptoms = 30 No heartburn symptoms = 0 Scores of ≤ 12 with each individual question not exceeding 2 indicate heartburn elimination. Regurgitation Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to questions 10-15. Worst regurgitation symptoms = 30 No regurgitation symptoms = 0 Scores of ≤ 12 with each individual question not exceeding 2 indicate regurgitation elimination.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.