About this trial
HEADSTART is a prospective, open-label, non-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that compares a composite of mortality and re-intervention in patients undergoing hemiarch and extended arch repair for acute DeBakey type 1 aortic dissection. Eligible patients will be randomized to one or the other surgical strategy and clinical and imaging outcome data will be collected over a 3 year follow up period.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Emergent surgical repair of Acute DeBakey Type 1 aortic dissection
Age >18 years and <70 years
Operating surgeon believes that both surgeries could be safe and effective
Disqualifiers
Hemodynamic instability/shock defined as systolic BP < 90 mm Hg
Previous cardiac surgery with sternotomy or thoracic endograft placement
Aortic arch diameter > 6cm in which a concomitant arch replacement is judged necessary
Procedures deemed to be "salvage operations" where the patient is unlikely to survive hospital discharge.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Hemiarch repair
Procedure/SurgeryCurrent standard of surgical repair consisting of ascending aortic replacement with open distal anastomosis at level of proximal arch under a period of hypothermic circulatory arrest . No surgical or endovascular intervention is carried out in the mid arch or descending aorta. Intra-operative management, including cannulation, cardioplegia, cerebral perfusion technique, and neurologic monitoring will be done according to each institution's current standard of practice.
Extended arch repair
Procedure/SurgerySurgical replacement of the ascending aorta along with intervention on the arch and descending aorta. Techniques for distal aspect of extended arch technique include but are not limited to total arch replacement along with TEVAR, Frozen Elephant Trunk procedure or surgical proximal arch replacement with bare metal stents in arch and descending aorta. Intra-operative management, including cannulation, cardioplegia, cerebral perfusion technique, and neurologic monitoring will be done according to each institution's current standard of practice.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Number of patients experiencing a composite end-point of mortality or re-intervention
Compare the proportion of patients between the two groups who over a 3 year follow up period attain a composite clinical end-point of 1) mortality, 2) late aortic re-intervention, either surgical or endovascular (\> 30 days from index procedure) or 3) early (\< 30 days from index procedure) re-intervention for branch malperfusion
Secondary outcomes
Number of patients achieving complete false lumen thrombosis on CT imaging
Compare the proportions of patients achieving complete false lumen (FL) thrombosis in the proximal, mid and distal descending thoracic aorta at 3 years after intervention between the two groups
Delta change in the ratio of true lumen to total aortic area (TL: Ao)
Compare delta change in the ratio of true lumen to total aortic area (TL:Ao) in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta from pre-operative to first post-operative CT scans, between the two groups.
Delta change in maximum cross-sectional descending thoracic aortic dimension
Compare delta change in the maximum cross-sectional descending thoracic dimension between the two groups over 3 years
Number of patients experiencing the listed peri-operative complications
To compare the proportion of patients experiencing the following peri-operative complications between the two groups: mortality, stroke, paraplegia/paraparesis, vascular injury, renal ischemia, bowel ischemia warranting operative intervention, peripheral limb ischemic changes and re-operation for bleeding.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.