Hemithoracic Irradiation With Proton Therapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity College, London

About this trial

Phase III randomised-controlled trial for patients with unilateral malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients ≥18 years of age, with biopsy confirmed MPM and histological subtyping (epithelioid or non-epithelioid)

N0 or N1 and M0 disease

Written informed consent

Patient and local/regional MDT opt for active surveillance and deferral of SACT until clinical or radiological progression

Disqualifiers

Presence of metastatic or contralateral disease

Cytological diagnosis and/or undetermined histological subtype

Prior thoracic radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy for MPM

Prior radical surgery for MPM (extrapleural pneumonectomy or extended pleurectomy decortication or pleurectomy decortication)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Proton beam therapy

    Radiation

    5 weeks (Mon-Fri) of proton beam treatment to the hemithorax to a dose of 50Gy in 25 fractions with a boost to 60Gy for the visible tumour (gross tumour volume-GTV).

Treatment groups

148 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Standard of careNo intervention 0 interventions
Group B: Proton beam therapyExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Progression free survival

Defined as the time from randomisation to the date of disease progression

Time frame
From randomisation up to 2 years of follow up
2

Overall survival

defined as the time from randomisation to the date of death from any cause.

Time frame
From randomisation up to 2 years of follow up

Secondary outcomes

1

Number of PBT-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0

AEs related to proton beam therapy will be collected

Time frame
From start of PBT up to 2 years of follow up, for long term effects
2

The EORTC quality of life questionnaire (QLQ), EORTC QLQ-C30 score, scale of 0-100.

Participant reported quality of life outcomes. The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / quality of life (QoL scale), and six single items. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

Time frame
From randomisation up to 2 years of follow up
3

ED-5D-5L score

Participant reported quality of life outcomes. The questionnaire comprises descriptive systems: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression; scored from, level 1 to 5; level 1 indicating no problem and level 5 indicating unable to/extreme problems. There is also a scale from 0-100 to describe health status, 100 being the best health the patient can imagine, 0 being the worst health they can imagine.

Time frame
From randomisation up to 2 years of follow up
4

Participant reported healthcare resource use from information collected on Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)

A tool used to collect participant reported information on the range of healthcare services and supports study participants may use, to calculate the rate of service usage to evaluate resource use as part of health economic analysis.

Time frame
From randomisation up to 2 years of follow up

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University College, London

Lead sponsor

Asthma + Lung UK

Collaborator

Mesothelioma UK

Collaborator

University of Sheffield

Collaborator