About this trial
Intubation in the intensive care unit is a standard procedure with a high risk of adverse events such as hypoxaemia and cardiovascular instability. However, it is demonstrated that HFNO (High Flow Nasal Oxygen) for pre and perioxygenation is feasible and, in many situations, prolongs the safe apnoeic period after anaesthesia induction. Previous data of the use of HFNO during intubation of the critically ill is conflicting.
With the new device Optiflow Switch, which allow its combination with NIV or tight facemask with perioxygenation, we aim to evaluate whether this could reduce intubation-related hypoxaemia and other adverse events.
The general purpose of this project is to compare the addition of Optiflow Switch for pre- and perioxygenation to traditional preoxygenation using a tight-fitting mask or NIV during intubation in adult intensive care patients in a prospective before-and-after study design.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adult, ≥18 years old
Intensive care patients that require tracheal intubation for any indication
Disqualifiers
Patients with skull or facial injuries where the application of nasal cannula is to be avoided, decided by the intensivist.
Pregnancy
Total nasal obstruction
Deemed not suitable for any other reason than the aforementioned
Trial population
All adult critically ill patients requiring intubation in the intensive care unit at Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Sweden will be included.
Trial design
Cohort
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Optiflow Switch
DeviceHigh flow nasal oxygen with the Optiflow Switch device
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Desaturation up until 5 minutes after intubation
Desaturation (below 90% SpO2 or \>5 % if \<90% after preoxygenation) up until 5 minutes after intubation in patients receiving standard preoxygenation or with the addition of perioxygenation with HFNO.
Secondary outcomes
Frequency of complications
Difference of frequency of complications (severe arrhythmias or hypotension, cardiac arrest, death) when using Optiflow Switch peri-oxygenation compared to traditional preoxygenation.
Change of intubation method
Difference in change of intubation method when using Optiflow Switch peri-oxygenation compared to traditional preoxygenation.
Intensive care length of stay
Difference in long-time intensive care outcome (length of stay, 30-day mortality, ventilator-induced pneumonia) when using Optiflow Switch peri-oxygenation compared to traditional preoxygenation.
ETCO2 in the first breath after intubation
Difference in ETCO2 in the first breath after intubation when using Optiflow Switch peri-oxygenation compared to traditional preoxygenation.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Region Stockholm
Lead sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Collaborator